Diagnostic Delay in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Has Not Changed Since the First Description 30 Years Ago: Diagnostic Delay in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

被引:25
|
作者
Murray, Fritz R. [1 ]
Kreienbuehl, Andrea S. [1 ]
Greuter, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Nennstiel, Simon [1 ]
Safroneeva, Ekaterina [4 ]
Saner, Catherine [2 ,3 ]
Schindler, Valeria [1 ]
Schlag, Christoph [1 ]
Schoepfer, Alain M. [2 ,3 ]
Schreiner, Philipp [1 ]
Straumann, Alex [1 ]
Biedermann, Luc [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] CHU Vaudois, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med, Bern, Switzerland
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2022年 / 117卷 / 11期
关键词
GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS; CARE-SEEKING; PREVALENCE; CHILDREN; FEATURES; RISK;
D O I
10.14309/ajg.0000000000001950
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic progressive disease. Diagnostic delay (DD) is associated with increased risk of esophageal strictures and food impactions. We aimed to assess the evolution of DD since the first description of EoE in 1993 until 2021. METHODS: We analyzed data from patients prospectively included in the Swiss EoE database. DD was calculated as the time interval between the first occurrence of EoE symptoms and the confirmed diagnosis. DD was analyzed annually over time (1989-2021) and according to milestone publications in the field (1993: first description; 2007: first consensus recommendations; and 2011: updated consensus recommendations). In addition, a Cox proportional hazards model has been used to describe the relation between DD and covariates. RESULTS: Complete data of 1,152 patients (857 male [74%]; median age at diagnosis: 38 years, interquartile range: 28-49, range: 1-86) were analyzed. Overall, median DD was 4 years (interquartile range: 1-11, range, 0-56), with DD >= 10 years in 32% of the population. Over time, DD did not significantly change, neither annually nor according to release dates of milestone publications with a persistently stable fraction of roughly one-third of all patients with a DD of >= 10 years. Both ages at diagnosis (P < 0.001, with an increase in DD up to the age of 31-40 years) and at symptom onset (younger patients had a longer DD; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with DD. DISCUSSION: DD has not changed since the first description of EoE almost 30 years ago and remains substantial. Even today, one-third of patients have a persistently high DD of >= 10 years. Substantial efforts are warranted to increase awareness for EoE and its hallmark symptom, solid food dysphagia, as an age-independent red-flag symptom among healthcare professionals and presumably the general population alike to lower risk of long-term complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1772 / 1779
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic delay in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis has not changed since first description 30 years ago
    Murray, Fritz R.
    Kreienbuehl, Andrea S.
    Greuter, Thomas
    Nennstiel, Simon
    Safroneeva, Ekaterina
    Saner, Catherine
    Schindler, Valeria
    Schlag, Christoph
    Schoepfer, Alain M.
    Schreiner, Philipp
    Straumann, Alex
    Biedermann, Luc
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2022, 152 : 4S - 4S
  • [2] DIAGNOSTIC DELAY IN PATIENTS WITH EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHGITIS HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE FIRST DESCRIPTION 30 YEARS AGO
    Murray, Fritz R.
    Kreienbuehl, Andrea
    Greuter, Thomas
    Nennstiel, Simon
    Safroneeva, Ekaterina
    Schindler, Valeria
    Schlag, Christoph
    Schoepfer, Alain M.
    Schreiner, Philipp
    Straumann, Alex
    Biedermann, Luc
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S537 - S537
  • [3] DIAGNOSTIC DELAY AND MISDIAGNOSIS IN EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS
    Lenti, M., V
    Savarino, E.
    Mauro, A.
    Penagini, R.
    Racca, F.
    Ghisa, M.
    Laserra, G.
    Arsie, E.
    Longoni, V
    De Bortoli, N.
    Sostilio, A.
    Marabotto, E.
    Ziola, S.
    Vanoli, A.
    Zingone, F.
    Barberio, B.
    Tolone, S.
    Docimo, L.
    Pellegatta, G.
    Paoletti, G.
    Ribolsi, M.
    Repici, A.
    Klersy, C.
    Di Sabatino, A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2021, 53 : S144 - S144
  • [4] ASSESSING FOR DISPARITIES IN THE DIAGNOSTIC DELAY IN EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS
    Redd, Walker D.
    Cotton, Cary C.
    LaFata, Sean
    Gee, Timothy S.
    Thel, Hannah L.
    Cameron, Brenderia A.
    Xue, Angela Z.
    Kiran, Akshatha
    Ocampo, Adolfo A.
    McCallen, Justin
    Lee, Christopher J.
    Borinsky, Stephanie A.
    Barlowe, Trevor
    Kaakati, Rayan N.
    Eluri, Swathi
    Reed, Craig C.
    Dellon, Evan S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S640 - S641
  • [5] Eosinophilic esophagitis, diagnostic criteria
    de Assis, E. A. C. P.
    Marques, J. B.
    Berg, B. N.
    Niman, J. F. P.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 57 : 84 - 84
  • [6] Eosinophilic esophagitis: diagnostic tests and criteria
    Dellon, Evan S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 28 (04) : 382 - 388
  • [7] Diagnostic criteria and limits of eosinophilic esophagitis
    Bridoux-Henno, L.
    REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE, 2018, 58 (03): : 220 - 221
  • [8] Impact of Diagnostic Delay and Other Risk Factors on Eosinophilic Esophagitis Phenotype and Esophageal Diameter
    Lipka, Seth
    Kumar, Ambuj
    Richter, Joel E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 50 (02) : 134 - 140
  • [9] Unmet Diagnostic Needs in Eosinophilic Esophagitis
    Katzka, David A.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2014, 32 (1-2) : 139 - 142
  • [10] Esophagitis in patients without gastroesophageal reflux disease or eosinophilic esophagitis: diagnostic considerations
    Lisovsky, Mikhail
    Srivastava, Amitabh
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 379 - 386