Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study

被引:147
作者
Breitenstein, Stefan [1 ]
Nocito, Antonio [1 ]
Pithan, Milo [2 ]
Held, Ulrike [2 ]
Weber, Markus [1 ]
Clavien, Pierre-Alain [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Surg, Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Ctr, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Horton Ctr, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e318172501f
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare safety and costs of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic chole-cystolithiasis. Background: Technical benefits of robotic-assisted surgery are well documented. However, pressure is currently applied to decrease costs, leading to restriction of development, and implementation of new technologies. So far, no convincing data are available comparing outcome or costs between computer assisted and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: A prospective case-matched study was conducted on 50 consecutive patients, who underwent robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (Da Vinci Robot, Intuitive Surgical) between December 2004 and February 2006. These patients were matched 1: 1 to 50 patients with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, according to age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histology, and surgical experience. Endpoints were complications after surgery (mean follow-up of 12.3 months [SD 1.2]), conversion rates, operative time, and hospital costs (ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT00562900). Results: No minor, but 1 major complication occurred in each group (2%). No conversion to open surgery was needed in either group. Operation time (skin-to-skin, 55 minutes vs. 50 minutes, P < 0.85) and hospital stay (2.6 days vs. 2.8 days) were similar. Overall hospital costs were significantly higher for robotic-assisted cholecystectomy $7985.4 (SD 1760.9) versus $6255.3 (SD 1956.4), P < 0.001, with a raw difference of $1730.1(95% CI 991.4-2468.7) and a difference adjusted for confounders of $1606.4 (95% CI 1076.7-2136.2). This difference was mainly related to the amortization and consumables of the robotic system. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is safe and, therefore, a valuable approach. Costs of robots, however, are high and do not justify the use of this technology considering the lack of benefits for patients. A reduction of acquisition and maintenance costs for the robotic system is a prerequisite for large-scale adoption and implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 993
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Aiono, S ;
Gilbert, JM ;
Soin, B ;
Finlay, PA ;
Gordan, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (09) :1267-1270
[2]   Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring - Review of early clinical results [J].
Ballantyne, GH .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (10) :1389-1402
[3]   Laparoscopic splenectomy with the da Vinci robot [J].
Bodner, J ;
Lucciarini, P ;
Fish, J ;
Kafka-Ritsch, R ;
Schmid, T .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 2005, 15 (01) :1-5
[4]   First experiences with the da Vinci™ operating robot in thoracic surgery [J].
Bodner, J ;
Wykypiel, H ;
Wetscher, G ;
Schmid, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 25 (05) :844-851
[5]  
Cadière GB, 2001, WORLD J SURG, V25, P1467
[6]   Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication [J].
Cadière, GB ;
Himpens, J ;
Vertruyen, M ;
Bruyns, J ;
Germay, O ;
Leman, G ;
Izizaw, R .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (09) :918-923
[7]   VALIDATION OF A COMBINED COMORBIDITY INDEX [J].
CHARLSON, M ;
SZATROWSKI, TP ;
PETERSON, J ;
GOLD, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (11) :1245-1251
[8]   Robotic surgical training in an academic institution [J].
Chitwood, WR ;
Nifong, W ;
Chapman, WHH ;
Felger, JE ;
Bailey, BM ;
Ballint, T ;
Mendleson, KG ;
Kim, VB ;
Young, JA ;
Albrecht, RA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (04) :475-484
[9]   The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in Pennsylvania: A 3-year summary [J].
Courcoulas, A ;
Schuchert, M ;
Gatti, G ;
Luketich, A .
SURGERY, 2003, 134 (04) :613-621
[10]   Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems [J].
Dakin, GF ;
Gagner, M .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (04) :574-579