Mind the energy performance gap: Evidence from green commercial buildings

被引:49
|
作者
Liang, Jing [1 ]
Qiu, Yueming [1 ]
Hu, Ming [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Publ Policy, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Architecture Planning & Preservat, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Green commercial buildings; Energy performance gap; Engineering factors; Behavioral factors; Organizational factors; POSTOCCUPANCY EVALUATION; EFFICIENCY; OFFICE; BARRIERS; INDIVIDUALS; CONSUMPTION; BEHAVIORS; DRIVERS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy performance gap refers to the discrepancy between the predicted and the realized energy savings after buildings adopt energy-efficient technologies. This study identifies and analyzes the organizational, behavioral and engineering factors related to the energy performance gap. 117 completed surveys from facility managers in the United States were obtained in 2017. We find that the primary reasons for the energy performance gap are (1) occupants using more energy than designed, (2) more occupants than originally designed, and (3) energy efficient technology failures. An analysis is conducted using probit models. The results show that LEED and Energy Star buildings are more likely to have tenant lease agreements to eliminate asymmetric information for new tenants. Energy Star buildings are more likely to have sub-metering for air conditioning. However, LEED buildings are associated with factors causing the energy performance gap, such as lack of sub-metering for AC and longer operating hours. Building characteristics such as occupancy rate, building type, ownership and building location influence the impacts of the identified socio-technical factors. Finally, several suggestions to mitigate the energy performance gap are proposed, such as incentives to facility managers, commissioning, energy performance contracting, and occupants' behavioral change.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 377
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mind the Gap:Predicted vs.Actual Performance of Green Buildings
    Brett Pollard
    施工技术, 2012, 41 (03) : 1 - 8
  • [2] Mind the Gap: Predicted vs. Actual Performance of Green Buildings
    Pollard, Brett
    ENVIRONMENT DESIGN GUIDE, 2011, (66)
  • [3] Green commercial buildings save energy
    Santamouris, Matthaios
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (11): : 613 - 614
  • [4] Green commercial buildings save energy
    Matthaios Santamouris
    Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1 : 613 - 614
  • [5] The impact of green buildings on CO 2 emissions: Evidence from commercial and residential buildings
    Sun, Yefei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 469
  • [6] Evaluation of the dynamic energy performance gap of green buildings: Case studies in China
    Wang, Dan
    Pang, Xiufeng
    Wang, Wei
    Qi, Zewei
    Ji, Ying
    Yin, Rongxin
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2020, 13 (06) : 1191 - 1204
  • [7] Evaluation of the dynamic energy performance gap of green buildings: Case studies in China
    Dan Wang
    Xiufeng Pang
    Wei Wang
    Zewei Qi
    Ying Ji
    Rongxin Yin
    Building Simulation, 2020, 13 : 1191 - 1204
  • [8] Benchmarking energy performance in commercial buildings
    Clark, David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 169 (06) : 225 - 232
  • [9] Mind the gap? Critically reviewing the energy efficiency gap with empirical evidence
    Stadelmann, Marcel
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 27 : 117 - 128
  • [10] Do energy retrofits work? Evidence from commercial and residential buildings in Phoenix
    Liang, Jing
    Qiu, Yueming
    James, Timothy
    Ruddell, Benjamin L.
    Dalrymple, Michael
    Earl, Stevan
    Castelazo, Alex
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 92 : 726 - 743