Will land transfer always increase technical efficiency in China?-A land cost perspective

被引:79
|
作者
Liu, Yu [1 ]
Yan, Binjian [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Yue [1 ]
Zhou, Yingheng [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jinshan Bao Inst Agr Modernizat, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Land transfer; Land cost; Technical efficiency; Moderate scale operation; Land use; SIZE; FRAGMENTATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasingly open market in China has ushered significant changes in the Chinese agricultural sector. Most existing research indicates that land transfer improves technical efficiency. However, this study finds that from the perspective of land cost, land transfer will have a negative impact on technical efficiency in China. With the development of agricultural moderate-scale operation, land cost continues to rise. From 2009 to 2016, land transfer price in Jiangsu Province rose from 3412.5 CNY/hm(2) to 11,866.5 CNY/hm(2), accounting for 38.1% of the total production cost. These are high prices, even at the international level. A further empirical test shows that land cost has an inverted "U" shape effect on the technical efficiency of wheat production. In other words, when the land cost for two growing seasons exceeds 3514.35 CNY/hm(2) or the land cost for the wheat growing season is above 1665.45 CNY/hm(2), increasing the land cost will further reduce the competitiveness of the wheat industry. To develop Chinese agriculture, it is necessary to internalize and market land cost through land contract cooperation and land custody. It is also possible to consider establishing a land-transfer insurance system and promote the sustainable development of land transfer.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 421
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of land reallocation on technical efficiency: evidence from China
    Zhang, Yanjie
    Wang, Xiaobing
    Glauben, Thomas
    Bruemmer, Bernhard
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 42 (04) : 495 - 507
  • [2] Land finance dependence and urban land marketization in China: The perspective of strategic choice of local governments on land transfer
    Fan, Xin
    Qiu, Sainan
    Sun, Yukun
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 99
  • [3] Impacts of Rural-Urban Labour Transfer and Land Transfer on Land Efficiency in China: A Analysis of Mediating Effects
    Pei, Siyi
    Zhao, Sudan
    Li, Xuan
    Li, Jiahui
    LAND, 2024, 13 (05)
  • [4] Does land transfer have an impact on land use efficiency? A case study on rural China
    Ma, Jiehua
    Chen, Shuanglian
    NATIONAL ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 4 (02): : 112 - 134
  • [5] Rural Land Tenure and Land Transfer Polices in China
    Si, Zhi-Zhi
    Nie, Feng-Ying
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT AND TRADE COOPERATION, 2014, 107 : 545 - 549
  • [6] Assessment of urban land use efficiency in China: A perspective of scaling law
    Jiao, Limin
    Xu, Zhibang
    Xu, Gang
    Zhao, Rui
    Liu, Jiafeng
    Wang, Weilin
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 99
  • [7] The impact of land consolidation on rapeseed cost efficiency in China: policy implications for sustainable land use and food security
    Zhang, Qing
    Ye, Feng
    Razzaq, Amar
    Feng, Zhongchao
    Liu, Yi
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [8] The effects of land transfer marketization on the urban land use efficiency: An empirical study based on 285 cities in China
    Jiang, Xu
    Lu, Xinhai
    Liu, Qi
    Chang, Cheng
    Qu, Lulu
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 132
  • [9] How land transfer affects agricultural land use efficiency: Evidence from China's agricultural sector
    Fei, Rilong
    Lin, Ziyi
    Chunga, Joseph
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 103
  • [10] LAND TENURE AND TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF SMALLHOLDER TEA PRODUCERS: THE CASE OF YA'AN CITY, CHINA
    Gessesse, Abrham Tezera
    He, Ge
    E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 (02): : 21 - 34