Characterizing Quantum Instruments: From Nondemolition Measurements to Quantum Error Correction

被引:1
|
作者
Stricker, Roman [1 ]
Vodola, Davide [2 ,3 ]
Erhard, Alexander [1 ]
Postler, Lukas [1 ]
Meth, Michael [1 ]
Ringbauer, Martin [1 ]
Schindler, Philipp [1 ]
Blatt, Rainer [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Mueller, Markus [6 ,7 ]
Monz, Thomas [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Inst Expt Phys, Technikerstr 25, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Univ Bologna, Dipartimento Fis & Astron, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
[3] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
[4] Austrian Acad Sci, Inst Quantenopt & Quanteninformat, Otto Hittmair Pl 1, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[5] Alpine Quantum Technol GmbH, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[6] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Quantum Informat, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
[7] Forschungszentrum Julich, Peter Grunberg Inst, Theoret Nanoelect, D-52425 Julich, Germany
来源
PRX QUANTUM | 2022年 / 3卷 / 03期
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 奥地利科学基金会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
QUBIT; REALIZATION; ENTANGLEMENT; SIMULATION; SYSTEM; CODES; MAPS;
D O I
10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.030318
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In advanced quantum processors, quantum operations are increasingly processed along multiple insequence measurements that result in classical data and affect the rest of the computation. Because of the information gain of classical measurements, nonunitary dynamical processes can affect the system, which common quantum channel descriptions fail to describe faithfully. Quantum measurements are correctly treated by so-called quantum instruments, capturing both classical outputs and postmeasurement quantum states. Here we present a general recipe for characterizing quantum instruments and demonstrate its experimental implementation and analysis. Thereby the full dynamics of a quantum instrument can be captured, exhibiting details of the quantum dynamics that would be overlooked with standard techniques. For illustration, we apply our characterization technique to a quantum instrument used for the detection of qubit loss and leakage, which was recently implemented as a building block in a quantum error-correction (QEC) experiment [Nature 585, 207 (2020)]. Our analysis reveals unexpected and in-depth information about the failure modes of the implementation of the quantum instrument. We then numerically study the implications of these experimental failure modes on QEC performance, when the instrument is employed as a building block in QEC protocols on a logical qubit. Our results highlight the importance of careful characterization and modeling of failure modes in quantum instruments, as compared to simplistic hardware-agnostic phenomenological noise models, which fail to predict the undesired behavior of faulty quantum instruments. The presented methods and results are directly applicable to generic quantum instruments and will be beneficial to many complex and high-precision applications.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Error channels in quantum nondemolition measurements on spin systems
    Joecker, Benjamin
    Stemp, Holly G.
    de Fuentes, Irene Fernandez
    Johnson, Mark A. I.
    Morello, Andrea
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2024, 109 (08)
  • [2] Quantum nondemolition measurements for quantum information
    Ralph, TC
    Bartlett, SD
    O'Brien, JL
    Pryde, GJ
    Wiseman, HM
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2006, 73 (01):
  • [3] QUANTUM NONDEMOLITION MEASUREMENTS FROM PATH INTEGRAL
    GOLUBTSOVA, GA
    MENSKY, MB
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS A, 1989, 4 (11): : 2733 - 2750
  • [4] Quantum nondemolition measurements of a qubit
    Averin, DV
    TOWARDS THE CONTROLLABLE QUANTUM STATES: MESOSCOPIC SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND SPINTRONICS, 2003, : 328 - 333
  • [5] Quantum nondemolition measurements of a qubit
    Averin, DV
    INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SUPERCONDUCTING NANO-ELECTRONICS DEVICES, 2002, : 1 - 10
  • [6] QUANTUM-GRAVITY AND QUANTUM NONDEMOLITION MEASUREMENTS
    VONBORZESZKOWSKI, HH
    TREDER, HJ
    ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, 1983, 40 (4-5) : 287 - 290
  • [7] QUANTUM NONDEMOLITION MEASUREMENTS VIA QUANTUM COUNTING
    MILBURN, GJ
    WALLS, DF
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1983, 28 (05): : 2646 - 2648
  • [8] NONIDEAL QUANTUM NONDEMOLITION MEASUREMENTS
    HOLLAND, MJ
    COLLETT, MJ
    WALLS, DF
    LEVENSON, MD
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1990, 42 (05): : 2995 - 3005
  • [9] QUANTUM SUPERPOSITIONS GENERATED BY QUANTUM NONDEMOLITION MEASUREMENTS
    YURKE, B
    SCHLEICH, W
    WALLS, DF
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1990, 42 (03): : 1703 - 1711
  • [10] ON THE PRINCIPLE OF QUANTUM NONDEMOLITION MEASUREMENTS
    KHOLEVO, AS
    THEORETICAL AND MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 65 (03) : 1250 - 1255