Assessing willingness to pay for health care quality improvements

被引:24
|
作者
Pavel, Md Sadik [1 ]
Chakrabarty, Sayan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gow, Jeff [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shahjalal Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Econ, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh
[2] Univ So Queensland, ADFI, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[3] Univ So Queensland, Australian Ctr Sustainable Business & Dev, Springfield, Qld 4300, Australia
[4] Univ So Queensland, Sch Commerce, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[5] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Res Associate, Hlth Econ & HIV AIDS Res Div HEARD, Durban, South Africa
来源
关键词
Contingent valuation (CV); Willingness to pay (WTP); Health care; Quality attributes; Bangladesh; STATED PREFERENCE; CONTINGENT VALUATION; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-015-0678-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Contingent valuation (CV) is used to estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) of consumers for specific attributes to improve the quality of health care they received in three hospitals in Bangladesh. Methods: Random sample of 252 patients were interviewed to measure their willingness to pay for seven specified improvements in the quality of delivered medical care. Partial tobit regression and corresponding marginal effects analysis were used to analyze the data and obtain WTP estimates. Results: Patients are willing to pay more if their satisfaction with three attributes of care are increased. These are: a closer doctor-patient relationship, increased drug availability and increased chances of recovery. The doctor patient relationship is considered most important by patients and exhibited the highest willingness to pay. Conclusions: This study provides important information to policy makers about the monetary valuation of patients for improvements in certain attributes of health care in Bangladesh.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing willingness to pay for health care quality improvements
    Md Sadik Pavel
    Sayan Chakrabarty
    Jeff Gow
    BMC Health Services Research, 15
  • [2] Comorbidities and the willingness to pay for health improvements
    Bleichrodt, H
    Crainich, D
    Eeckhoudt, L
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2003, 87 (11) : 2399 - 2406
  • [3] Willingness to pay for health care
    Donaldson, C
    Shackley, P
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, : 1 - 24
  • [4] Assessing community values in health care: Is the 'willingness to pay' method feasible?
    Donaldson, C
    Farrar, S
    Mapp, T
    Walker, A
    Macphee, S
    HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 1997, 5 (01) : 7 - 29
  • [5] Assessing community values in health care: Is the ‘Willingness to pay’ method feasible?
    Cam Donaldson
    Shelley Farrar
    Tracy Mapp
    Andrew Walker
    Susan Macphee
    Health Care Analysis, 1997, 5 (1) : 7 - 29
  • [6] WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN DRINKING-WATER QUALITY
    JORDAN, JL
    ELNAGHEEB, AH
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1993, 29 (02) : 237 - 245
  • [7] Willingness to pay for health improvements of physical activity on prescription
    Rome, Asa
    Persson, Ulf
    Ekdahl, Charlotte
    Gard, Gunvor
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 38 (02) : 151 - 159
  • [8] Willingness to pay for water quality improvements: The case of precision application technology
    Hite, D
    Hudson, D
    Intarapapong, W
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 27 (02) : 433 - 449
  • [9] Quality Health Care and Willingness to Pay for Health Insurance Retention: A Randomized Experiment in Kolkata Slums
    Delavallade, Clara
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (05) : 619 - 638
  • [10] Improving willingness to pay estimates for quality improvements through joint estimation with quality perceptions
    Whitehead, John C.
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2006, 73 (01) : 100 - 111