Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: Description of technique and outcomes

被引:50
|
作者
Liang, Zhiqing [1 ]
Chen, Yong [1 ]
Xu, Huicheng [1 ]
Li, Yuyan [1 ]
Wang, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Southwest Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chongqing 400038, Peoples R China
关键词
Cervical cancer; Nerve-sparing; Radical hysterectomy; Fascia space dissection technique; Laparoscopic; PELVIC AUTONOMIC NERVES; SURGICAL ANATOMY; UROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS; PLEXUS TRAUMA; SURGERY; FEASIBILITY; IDENTIFICATION; LIGAMENTS; BLADDER; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.06.033
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. The objectives of this study were to describe our laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) technique and to assess the feasibility and safety of the procedure, as well as its impact on voiding function. We introduce a fascia space dissection technique in order to preserve the pelvic splanchnic nerve, the hypogastric nerve and the bladder branch of the inferior hypogastric plexus under magnification (x 10.5) during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Methods. From October 2006 to November 2009, 163 consecutive patients with cervical cancer underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and pelvic lymphadenectomy, with 82 women undergoing LNSRH with fascia space dissection technique (LNSRH group) and 81 undergoing LRH (LRH group). Data from 163 patients were prospectively collected and compared. Post-operative assessment of bladder function included the following: the time to recover the ability to void spontaneously and to achieve a post-void residual urine (PVR) volume of less than 50 ml, with urination function graded. Results. The laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy procedure was completed successfully and was conducted safely in all of the patients. There were no conversions to open surgery in the two groups. The median operative duration in the LNSRH and the LRH groups were 163.52 +/- 34.47 min and 132.13 +/- 31.42 min, respectively. Blood loss was 142.12 +/- 62.38 ml and 187.69 +/- 68.63 ml, respectively. The time taken to obtain a post-void residual urine volume of less than 50 ml after removal of the urethral catheter was 7.42 +/- 2.35 d (5-18 d) in LNSRH group and was 16.75 +/- 7.73 d (5-35 d) in LRH group (P<0.05). The bladder void function recovery to Grades 0-1 was 76 (92.7%) for the LNSRH group and 59(72.8%) for the LRH group. A mean follow-up of 22.3 (5-42) months was adhered to, and no patient had a recurrence or metastasis. Conclusions. The technique described in this preliminary study appears to be safe, feasible, and easy in our population, with satisfactory recovery of voiding function. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 207
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Description of the technique and patients' outcome
    Kavallaris, A.
    Hornemann, A.
    Chalvatzas, N.
    Luedders, D.
    Diedrich, K.
    Bohlmann, M. K.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 119 (02) : 198 - 201
  • [2] Nerve plane-sparing radical hysterectomy: a simplified technique of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer
    Li Bin
    Li Wei
    Sun Yang-chun
    Zhang Rong
    Zhang Gong-yi
    Yu Gao-zhi
    Wu Ling-ying
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (12) : 1807 - 1812
  • [3] Anatomical consideration for the technique of nerve-sparing during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
    Balaya, V.
    Ngo, C.
    Rossi, L.
    Cornou, C.
    Bensaid, C.
    Douard, R.
    Bats, A. S.
    Lecuru, F.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2016, 44 (09): : 517 - 525
  • [4] Nerve-Sparing Technique during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Critical Steps
    Diaz-Feijoo, Berta
    Bradbury, Melisa
    Perez-Benavente, Assumpcio
    Franco-Camps, Silvia
    Gil-Moreno, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (07) : 1144 - 1145
  • [5] Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer
    Jarruwale, Phanida
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    Benavides, Doris R.
    Su, Hsuan
    Lee, Chyi-Long
    GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2013, 2 (02): : 42 - 47
  • [6] Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: Description of the nerve-sparing technique
    Peschel, R
    Gettman, MT
    Neururer, R
    Hobisch, A
    Bartsch, G
    UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (02) : 339 - 343
  • [7] Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy: Technique and initial outcomes
    Lane, Brian R.
    Finelli, Antonio
    Moinzadeh, Alireza
    Sharp, David S.
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (04) : 778 - 783
  • [8] ROBOTIC NERVE-SPARING VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN EARLY CERVICAL CANCER : URINARY DISEASES
    Narducci, F.
    Merlot, B.
    Bresson, L.
    Nickers, P.
    Leblanc, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)
  • [9] Laparoscopic technique for step-by-step nerve-sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy
    Sekiyama, Kentaro
    Ando, Yukiko
    Taga, Atsuko
    Kozono, Yuki
    Higuchi, Toshihiro
    Fujii, Shingo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (02) : 276 - 277
  • [10] Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Feasibility and technique
    Magrina, Javier F.
    Pawlina, Wojciech
    Kho, Rosanne M.
    Magtibay, Paul M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (03) : 605 - 609