Swine lagoon effluent as a source of nitrogen and phosphorus for summer forage grasses

被引:53
|
作者
Adeli, A [1 ]
Varco, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2001.9351174x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Efficient crop utilization of N and P derived from anaerobic swine (Sus scrofa domesticus) lagoon effluent is critical to minimizing offsite nutrient movement. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of variable rates of swine lagoon effluent and fertilizer N and P on yield and nutrient utilization of forage grasses on an acid Vaiden silty clay (very fine, montmorillonitic, thermic, Vertic Hapludalf) and an alkaline Okolona silty clay (fine, montmorillonitic, thermic, Typic Chromudert). Treatments were multiple effluent irrigations resulting in four N and P rates from 0 to 665 and 0 to 94 kg ha(-1) yr(-1) N and P, respectively. Fertilizer treatments were also established at equivalent N and P rates. Similar growth responses were obtained for bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] or johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] regardless of nutrient source. Application of either effluent or fertilizer at rates >448 kg N ha(-1) did not effectively increase dry matter yield. Total N accumulation reflected both increasing dry matter yield and tissue N concentration while P accumulation depended primarily on increasing yield. Forage grass accumulation of N and P ws similar between sources, but recovery efficiency for both elements declined with increasing rates. Similarity in N and P availability of effluent to fertilizer simplifies nutrient management although potential N loss by NH3 volatilization is likely greater for effluent while fertilizer may result in greater end-of-season soil NO3--N levels at equivalent rates of applied N.
引用
收藏
页码:1174 / 1181
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Swine lagoon effluent disposal by overland flow: Effects on forage production and uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus
    Liu, FH
    Mitchell, CC
    Odom, JW
    Hill, DT
    Rochester, EW
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1997, 89 (06) : 900 - 904
  • [2] Nitrate accumulation in forage as affected by nitrogen and potassium fertilizers applied with swine lagoon effluent
    Phillips, JM
    Wang, B
    Kellogg, DW
    Johnson, ZB
    1996 AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL, PROCEEDINGS: FORAGES - PACIFIC NORTHWEST TO PACIFIC RIM, 1996, 5 : 221 - 225
  • [3] Soybean as a receiver crop for nitrogen in swine lagoon effluent
    Israel, DW
    Mikkelsen, RL
    SOIL SCIENCE, 2001, 166 (07) : 453 - 464
  • [4] Production of napiergrass as a forage and bioenergy feedstock with swine-lagoon effluent
    Read, John J.
    Lang, David J.
    Anderson, William F.
    AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL LETTERS, 2021, 6 (02)
  • [5] Struvite formation to remove phosphorus from anaerobic swine lagoon effluent
    Nelson, NO
    Mikkelsen, RL
    Hesterberg, DL
    ANIMAL, AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD PROCESSING WASTES, 2000, : 18 - 26
  • [6] Nitrogen loss and transformations in croplands receiving applications of swine lagoon effluent
    Hernández, JA
    Cobb, CR
    Mikkelsen, RL
    ANIMAL, AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD PROCESSING WASTES, 2000, : 588 - 596
  • [7] REDUCING PHOSPHORUS IN SWINE EFFLUENT WITH ALUMINUM CHLORIDE TREATMENT DURING LAGOON CLEANOUT
    DeLaune, P. B.
    Moore, P. A., Jr.
    Formica, S.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2010, 26 (05) : 867 - 871
  • [8] Phosphorus recovery in surface runoff from swine lagoon effluent by overland flow
    Liu, F
    Mitchell, CC
    Hill, DT
    Odom, JW
    Rochester, EW
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1997, 26 (04) : 995 - 1001
  • [9] Forage characteristics, steer performance, and water quality from bermudagrass pastures fertilized with two levels of nitrogen from swine lagoon effluent
    Harvey, W
    Mueller, JP
    Barker, JA
    Poore, MH
    Zublena, JP
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, 74 (02) : 457 - 464
  • [10] Nitrogen utilization by forage grasses
    Bélanger, G
    Gastal, F
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2000, 80 (01) : 11 - 20