Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound and liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases

被引:13
|
作者
Russolillo, Nadia [1 ]
Borello, Alessandro [1 ]
Langella, Serena [1 ]
Casella, Michele [1 ]
Lo Tesoriere, Roberto [1 ]
Ferrero, Alessandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Umberto I Mauriziano Hosp, Dept Gen & Oncol Surg, Largo Turati 62, I-10128 Turin, Italy
关键词
Ultrasonography; Laparoscopy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoplasm staging; Neoplasm metastasis; Colorectal neoplasms; ENHANCED INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY; STRATEGY; SURGERY; CANCER; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-07817-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Intraoperative liver ultrasound appears superior to liver-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to stage colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Most of the data come from studies on open surgery. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) is technically demanding and its reliability is poor investigated. Aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of LUS staging for CRLMs compared to MRI. Methods All patients with CRLMs scheduled for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) between 01/2010 and 06/2019 who underwent preoperative MRI were considered for the study. LUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient by patient basis. Reference standards were final pathology and 6 months follow-up results. Results Amongst 189 LLR for CRLMs, 146 met inclusion criteria. Overall, 391 CRLMs were preoperatively detected by MRI. 24 new nodules in 16 (10.9%) patients were found by LUS and resected. Median diameter of new nodules was 5.5 mm (2-10 mm) and 10 (41.6%) were located in the hepatic dome. Pathology confirmed 17 newly detected malignant nodules (median size 4 mm) in 11 (7.5%) patients. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumours differed between LUS and MRI in 9 patients (6.1%). Intraoperative surgical strategy changed according LUS findings in 19 (13%) patients, requiring conversion to open approach in 3 (15.8%) of them. The sensitivity of LUS was superior to MRI (93.1% vs 85.6% whilst specificity was similar (98.6% MRI vs 96.5% LUS). Conclusions Laparoscopic liver ultrasound improves liver staging for CRLMs compared to liver-specific MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:3547 / 3553
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound and liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases
    Nadia Russolillo
    Alessandro Borello
    Serena Langella
    Michele Casella
    Roberto Lo Tesoriere
    Alessandro Ferrero
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 3547 - 3553
  • [2] Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?
    Langella, Serena
    Ardito, Francesco
    Russolillo, Nadia
    Panettieri, Elena
    Perotti, Serena
    Mele, Caterina
    Giuliante, Felice
    Ferrero, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2019
  • [3] LIVER MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) IN POTENTIALLY RESECTABLE COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES
    Wong, R.
    Whittle, J. R.
    Page, P.
    Fox, A.
    Mackay, S.
    Johnson, M. A.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 : 68 - 68
  • [4] Ultrasound-Triggered BSA/SPION Hybrid Nanoclusters for Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Zhang, Bingbo
    Li, Qi
    Yin, Peihao
    Rui, Yuanpeng
    Qiu, Yanyan
    Wang, Yan
    Shi, Donglu
    ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2012, 4 (12) : 6479 - 6486
  • [5] Characterization of hepatic lesions (≤30 mm) with liver-specific contrast agents: A comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging
    Takahashi, Masanori
    Maruyama, Hitoshi
    Shimada, Taro
    Kamezaki, Hidehiro
    Sekimoto, Tadashi
    Kanai, Fumihiko
    Yokosuka, Osamu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [6] Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of colorectal liver metastases
    Blythe, S
    Blakeborough, A
    Slater, R
    Majeed, AW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (03) : 373 - 374
  • [7] Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of colorectal liver metastases
    Blyth, S.
    Blakeborough, A.
    Peterson, M.
    Cameron, I. C.
    Majeed, A. W.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2008, 90 (01) : 25 - 28
  • [8] Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Liver-Specific Contrast
    Su, Tung-Hung
    Kao, Jia-Horng
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2017, 3 (04) : 446 - 447
  • [9] Routine Preoperative Liver-specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging Does Not Exclude the Necessity of Contrast-enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound in Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis
    Arita, Junichi
    Ono, Yoshihiro
    Takahashi, Michiro
    Inoue, Yosuke
    Takahashi, Yu
    Matsueda, Kiyoshi
    Saiura, Akio
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (06) : 1086 - 1091
  • [10] Improved detection of liver metastases with phase inversion imaging during the liver-specific phase of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist
    Albrecht, T
    Hoffmann, CW
    Schettler, S
    Overberg, A
    Ilg, M
    Wolf, KJ
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (Suppl 3) : S388 - S388