Measurement-driven, model-based estimation of residual stress and its effects on fatigue crack growth. Part 1: Validation of an eigenstrain model*

被引:3
|
作者
Ribeiro, Renan L. [1 ]
Olson, Mitchell [2 ]
Hill, Michael R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Shields Ave 1, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Hill Engn LLC, 3083 Gold Canal Dr, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 USA
关键词
Quenching; Residual stress; Finite element analysis; Eigenstrain; Contour method; CONTOUR METHOD; PREDICTION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107070
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to validate a measurement-driven, model-based approach to estimate residual stress (RS) in samples machined from quenched aluminum stock. Model input is derived from measurement of RS in the parent stock. Validation is performed for prismatic T-sections removed from bars at different locations. We find RS predicted agrees with RS measured, by contour and neutron diffraction methods, with root-mean-square model-measurement difference of 22 MPa. Follow-on work (in Part 2) applies the RS estimation to samples representative of aircraft structures and examines the effects of RS on fatigue crack growth in the RS-bearing samples.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Measurement-driven, model-based estimation of residual stress and its effects on fatigue crack growth. Part 2: Fatigue crack growth testing and modeling
    Ribeiro, Renan L.
    Hill, Michael R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2022, 163
  • [2] Analysing effect of residual stresses based on crack closure model for part through fatigue crack growth problems
    Wang, GS
    Blom, AF
    DAMAGE AND FRACTURE MECHANICS: COMPUTER AIDED ASSESSMENT AND CONTROL, 1998, : 627 - 638
  • [3] Fatigue crack growth modelling by means of the strain energy density-based Huffman model considering the residual stress effect
    Ribeiro, Victor
    Correia, Jose
    Mourao, Antonio
    Lesiuk, Grzegorz
    Goncalves, Aparecido
    De Jesus, Abilio
    Berto, Filippo
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2022, 140