Energy and exergy analyses of the oxidation and gasification of carbon

被引:68
|
作者
Prins, MJ [1 ]
Ptasinski, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Environm Technol Grp, Dept Chem Engn & Chem, Lab Chem Reactor Engn, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2004.08.010
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Exergy losses in gasification and combustion of solid carbon are compared by conceptually dividing the processes into several subprocesses: instantaneous chemical reaction, heat transfer from reaction products to reactants (internal thermal energy exchange) and product mixing. Gasification is more efficient than combustion because exergy losses due to internal thermal energy exchange are reduced from 14-16 to 5-7% of expended exergy, while the chemical reactions are relatively efficient for both processes. The losses due to internal thermal energy exchange may be reduced by replacing air with oxygen, although this introduces additional process losses for separation of oxygen from air, or alternatively, preheating of air by heat exchange with product gas. For oxygen-blown gasification of fuels with high calorific value, such as solid carbon, it is advisable to moderate the temperature by introduction of steam. At optimum gasification temperatures in the ranges of 1100-1200 K (for atmospheric pressure) and 1200-1300 K (for 10 bar pressure), up to 75% of the chemical exergy contained in solid carbon can be preserved in the chemical exergy of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:982 / 1002
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy and exergy analyses of the oxidation and gasification of carbon (vol 30, pg 982, 2005)
    Prins, M. J.
    Ptasinski, K. J.
    ENERGY, 2006, 31 (12) : 2245 - 2246
  • [2] Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production by coal gasification
    Seyitoglu, S. S.
    Dincer, I.
    Kilicarslan, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (04) : 2592 - 2600
  • [3] Energy and exergy analyses of an intensified char gasification process
    Meng, Sai
    Zulli, Paul
    Yang, Chaohe
    Wang, Zhe
    Meng, Qingbo
    Zhang, Guangqing
    ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [4] Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated SOFC and coal gasification system
    El-Emam, Rami Salah
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Naterer, Greg F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (02) : 1689 - 1697
  • [5] Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated CCHP system with biomass air gasification
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Yang, Kun
    Xu, Zi-Long
    Fu, Chao
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 142 : 317 - 327
  • [6] Microwave torrefaction integrated with gasification: Energy and exergy analyses based on Aspen Plus modeling
    Jiao, Liguo
    Li, Jian
    Yan, Beibei
    Chen, Guanyi
    Ahmed, Sarwaich
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 319
  • [7] Energy and Exergy Analyses of Fluidized-Bed Municipal Solid Waste Air Gasification
    Tang, Yuanjun
    Dong, Jun
    Chi, Yong
    Zhou, Zhaozhi
    Ni, Mingjiang
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (09) : 7629 - 7637
  • [8] Energy, exergy, and environmental analyses of a poly-generation system based on biomass gasification
    Khanmohammadi, Shoaib
    Atashkari, Kazem
    FUEL, 2022, 320
  • [9] Energy, exergy, and environmental analyses of renewable hydrogen production through plasma gasification of microalgal biomass
    Kuo, Po-Chih
    Illathukandy, Biju
    Wu, Wei
    Chang, Jo-Shu
    ENERGY, 2021, 223
  • [10] Energy and exergy analyses of syngas produced from rice husk gasification in an entrained flow reactor
    Zhang, Yaning
    Zhao, Yijun
    Gao, Xiaoyan
    Li, Bingxi
    Huang, Jingqi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 95 : 273 - 280