A Systematic Review of Open Source Clinical Software on GitHub for Improving Software Reuse in Smart Healthcare

被引:8
|
作者
Shen, Zhengru [1 ]
Spruit, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, NL-3584 CC Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 01期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
open source; GitHub; clinical software; systematic study; generalized additive models; topic modeling; TOOLS;
D O I
10.3390/app9010150
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The plethora of open source clinical software offers great reuse opportunities for developers to build clinical tools at lower cost and at a faster pace. However, the lack of research on open source clinical software poses a challenge for software reuse in clinical software development. This paper aims to help clinical developers better understand open source clinical software by conducting a thorough investigation of open source clinical software hosted on GitHub. We first developed a data pipeline that automatically collected and preprocessed GitHub data. Then, a deep analysis with several methods, such as statistical analysis, hypothesis testing, and topic modeling, was conducted to reveal the overall status and various characteristics of open source clinical software. There were 14,971 clinical-related GitHub repositories created during the last 10 years, with an average annual growth rate of 55%. Among them, 12,919 are open source clinical software. Our analysis unveiled a number of interesting findings: Popular open source clinical software in terms of the number of stars, most productive countries that contribute to the community, important factors that make an open source clinical software popular, and 10 main groups of open source clinical software. The results can assist both researchers and practitioners, especially newcomers, in understanding open source clinical software.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open Source Software Recommendations Using Github
    Koskela, Miika
    Simola, Inka
    Stefanidis, Kostas
    DIGITAL LIBRARIES FOR OPEN KNOWLEDGE, TPDL 2018, 2018, 11057 : 279 - 285
  • [2] REACT - A Process for Improving Open-Source Software Reuse
    Lampropoulos, Alexander
    Ampatzoglou, Apostolos
    Bibi, Stamatia
    Chatzigeorgiou, Alexander
    Stamelos, Ioannis
    2018 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE QUALITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (QUATIC), 2018, : 251 - 254
  • [3] Code reuse in open source software
    Haefliger, Stefan
    von Krogh, Georg
    Spaeth, Sebastian
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (01) : 180 - 193
  • [4] The Geography of Open Source Software: Evidence from GitHub
    Wachs, Johannes
    Nitecki, Mariusz
    Schueller, William
    Polleres, Axel
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 176
  • [5] Software Architecture Degradation in Open Source Software: A Systematic Literature Review
    Baabad, Ahmed
    Zulzalil, Hazura Binti
    Hassan, Sa'adah
    Baharom, Salmi Binti
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 173681 - 173709
  • [6] Evolution Model of Open-Source Software Projects in GitHub
    Wang, Hongbing
    Ji, Haoran
    2022 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (SEAI 2022), 2022, : 135 - 145
  • [7] A systematic review of research on open source software in commercial software product development
    Host, Martin
    Orucevic-Alagic, Alma
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 53 (06) : 616 - 624
  • [8] OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE IN DENTISTRY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Chrusciel-Nogalska, Malgorzata
    Smektala, Tomasz
    Tutak, Marcin
    Sporniak-Tutak, Katarzyna
    Olszewski, Raphael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 33 (04) : 487 - 493
  • [9] Systematic literature review in open source software maintainability
    Sultan, A. B. M. (abakar@fsktm.upm.edu.my), 1600, Praise Worthy Prize (07):
  • [10] A Systematic Review of Studies of Open Source Software Evolution
    Breivold, Hongyu Pei
    Chauhan, Muhammad Aufeef
    Babar, Muhammad Ali
    17TH ASIA PACIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APSEC 2010), 2010, : 356 - 365