Examining minimal important change of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for subacute rehabilitation hospital inpatients

被引:11
|
作者
Ohno, Kanta [1 ,2 ]
Tomori, Kounosuke [1 ]
Sawada, Tatsunori [1 ]
Kobayashi, Ryuji [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Univ Technol, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil, Occupat Therapy, 5-23-22 Nishikamata, Tokyo 1448535, Japan
[2] Tokyo Metropolitan Univ, Grad Sch Human Hlth Sci, Dept Occupat Therapy, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; Minimal clinically important difference; Patient-reported Outcome; Subacute rehabilitation hospital; Response shift; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; RESPONSE-SHIFT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; RESPONSIVENESS; QUALITY; BIAS; INSTRUMENTS; VALIDITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1186/s41687-021-00405-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is an individualized patient-reported outcome designed to evaluate the self-perceptions of a patient's occupational performance. Our study aimed to examine the minimal important change (MIC) in inpatients undergoing subacute rehabilitation. The MIC values were calculated using the three different anchor-based analyses with the transition index as an external criterion; the mean change method (MICMeanChange), the receiver operating characteristic (MICROC) analysis, and the predictive modeling method adjusted for the proportion of improved patients (MICadjust). In this study, the MICadjust value was considered as the most valid statistical method. We recruited 100 inpatients with various health conditions from subacute rehabilitation hospitals. Data were collected twice: an initial assessment and a reassessment one month later. The systematic interview format (Five Ws and How) was used for both the initial and second assessments to prevent information bias (response shift). Results Three patients who indicated deterioration on the transition index were excluded from all analyses, and 97 patients were analyzed in this study. The MICadjust values were 2.20 points (95% confidence interval 1.80-2.59) for the COPM performance score and 2.06 points (95% confidence interval 1.73-2.39) for the COPM satisfaction score. The MICMeanChange and MICROC values were considered less reasonable to interpret because the proportions of the improved patients subgroup were more than 50% (82.5%). Conclusions The MICadjust value estimates from this study can help detect whether the patients' perceived occupational performance improved or did not change. The results support the multidisciplinary use of COPM in clinical practice and research on subacute rehabilitation inpatients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Examining minimal important change of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for subacute rehabilitation hospital inpatients
    Kanta Ohno
    Kounosuke Tomori
    Tatsunori Sawada
    Ryuji Kobayashi
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 5
  • [2] Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Among Patients With Frozen Shoulder
    Kim, Sun Woo
    Lim, Ji Young
    Kim, Seonghee
    Do, Jong Geol
    Lee, Jong In
    Hwang, Ji Hye
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2024, 78 (04):
  • [3] Use of the modified Canadian occupational performance measure in pulmonary rehabilitation
    Callaghan, J.
    Gray, F.
    Bott, J.
    THORAX, 2006, 61 : II68 - II68
  • [4] Functional outcome in pulmonary rehabilitation using the canadian occupational performance measure
    Callaghan, J.
    Gray, F.
    Bott, J.
    THORAX, 2006, 61 : II36 - II36
  • [5] Systematic review of measurement properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in geriatric rehabilitation
    de Waal, Margot W. M.
    Haaksma, Miriam L.
    Doornebosch, Arno J.
    Meijs, Rimmie
    Achterberg, Wilco P.
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2022, 13 (06) : 1281 - 1298
  • [6] Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in spinal cord injury rehabilitation
    Gustafsson, Louise
    Mitchell, Genna
    Fleming, Jenny
    Price, Glenda
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2012, 75 (07) : 337 - 342
  • [7] Systematic review of measurement properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in geriatric rehabilitation
    Margot W. M. de Waal
    Miriam L. Haaksma
    Arno J. Doornebosch
    Rimmie Meijs
    Wilco P. Achterberg
    European Geriatric Medicine, 2022, 13 : 1281 - 1298
  • [8] Documenting change with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for children with cerebral palsy
    Kang, Mani
    Smith, Emma
    Goldsmith, Charles H.
    Switzer, Lauren
    Rosenbaum, Peter
    Wright, Frances Virginia
    Fehlings, Darcy
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2020, 62 (10): : 1154 - 1160
  • [9] The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
    Kjeken, I.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2006, 65 : 36 - 37
  • [10] The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
    Eyssen, ICJM
    Beelen, A
    Dedding, C
    Cardol, M
    Dekker, J
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2005, 19 (08) : 888 - 894