Over the last few years, reorganization practice has undergone a massive change. A new device the restructuring support agreement has transformed chapter 11 negotiations. This puts reorganization law at a crossroads. Chapter 11's commitment to a nonmarket restructuring with a rigid priority system requires bankruptcy judges to police bargaining in bankruptcy, but the Bankruptcy Code gives them relatively little explicit guidance about how they should adjust when a new practice alters the bargaining environment. This Essay shows that long-established principles of bankruptcy should lead judges to focus not on how these agreements affect what each party receives, but rather on how they can interfere with the flow of information needed to apply chapter 11's substantive rules.
机构:
Freedom House, Africa Program, Washington, DC 20036 USA
Ctr Strateg & Int Studies, Washington, DC 20036 USA
US Inst Peace, Africa Program, Washington, DC 20037 USAFreedom House, Africa Program, Washington, DC 20036 USA
Temin, Jon
Badwaza, Yoseph
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Freedom House, Ethiopia, Washington, DC USA
Ethiopian Human Rights Council EHRCO, Ethiopias Foremost Human Rights NGO, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaFreedom House, Africa Program, Washington, DC 20036 USA