Objective: This study sought to compare contraception provided to patients after medication and surgical abortion. Study Design: Women who underwent first trimester induced abortion at a university-based urban clinic between May 2009 and May 2014 were identified. Medical records were reviewed to determine the method of contraception provided by the clinic to patients after medication and surgical abortion. Postabortal contraception was defined as any contraception administered or prescribed from our health system within 4 weeks of surgical abortion or mifepristone administration. Results: We reviewed 824 women who were 9 weeks gestational age or less and able to choose between medication and surgical termination of pregnancy. Overall, 587 (71.1%) had a surgical abortion and 237 (28.9%) had a medication abortion. Women who had surgical abortions were more likely to initiate long-acting reversible contraception (41.9% vs. 23.2%; p < .0001) and more likely to be provided with any type of contraception overall (83% vs. 64.6%; p < .0001). The overall follow-up rate after medication abortion was 71.7%. Conclusions: Women who had surgical abortions had a greater odds of receiving long-acting reversible contraception than those who had medication abortions. Surgical abortion patients were also more likely to be provided contraception overall. Further prospective research is needed to determine the reasons for this difference and to ensure that all patients obtain the contraception that they desire. (C) 2017 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc.
机构:
Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, ANSIRH, San Francisco, CA 94143 USAUniv Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, ANSIRH, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Complex Family Planning, San Diego, CA 92093 USAUniv Calif San Diego, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Complex Family Planning, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
Sandoval, Selina
Rafie, Sally
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Pharm, San Diego, CA USAUniv Calif San Diego, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Complex Family Planning, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
Rafie, Sally
Kully, Gennifer
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Complex Family Planning, San Diego, CA 92093 USAUniv Calif San Diego, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Complex Family Planning, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
Kully, Gennifer
Mody, Sheila
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Complex Family Planning, San Diego, CA 92093 USAUniv Calif San Diego, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Complex Family Planning, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
Mody, Sheila
Averbach, Sarah
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Complex Family Planning, San Diego, CA 92093 USAUniv Calif San Diego, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Complex Family Planning, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
机构:
Harvard Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA USA
Univ Missouri Kansas City, Sch Med, Kansas City, MO USA
Harvard Kennedy Sch Govt, 79 John F Kennedy St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USAHarvard Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA USA
Jain, Divya
Davies, MiQuel
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Phys Reprod Hlth, Washington, DC USAHarvard Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA USA
Davies, MiQuel
Perritt, Jamila
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Phys Reprod Hlth, Washington, DC USAHarvard Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA USA
Perritt, Jamila
Blasdell, Jennifer
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Phys Reprod Hlth, Washington, DC USAHarvard Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA USA