Adaptive surrogate-based design optimization with expected improvement used as infill criterion

被引:20
|
作者
Xu, Q. [1 ]
Wehrle, E. [1 ]
Baier, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Lehrstuhl Leichtbau, Munich, Germany
关键词
design optimization; surrogate modelling; adaptive surrogate based design optimization; expected improvement;
D O I
10.1080/02331934.2011.644286
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A prominent advantage of using surrogate models in structural design optimization is that computational effort can be greatly reduced without significantly compromising model accuracy. The essential goal is to perform the design optimization with fewer evaluations of the typically finite element analysis and ensuring accuracy of the optimization results. An adaptive surrogate based design optimization framework is proposed, in which Latin hypercube sampling and Kriging are used to build surrogate models. Accuracy of the models is improved adaptively using an infill criterion called expected improvement (EI). It is the anticipated improvement that an interpolation point will lead to the current surrogate models. The point that will lead to the maximum EI is searched and used as infill points at each iteration. For constrained optimization problems, the surrogate of constraint is also utilized to form a constrained EI as the corresponding infill criterion. Computational trials on mathematical test functions and on a three-dimensional aircraft wing model are carried out to test the feasibility of this method. Compared with the traditional surrogate base design optimization and direct optimization methods, this method can find the optimum design with fewer evaluations of the original system model and maintain good accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 684
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A surrogate-based optimization design method based on hybrid infill sampling criterion
    Li Z.-L.
    Peng S.-S.
    Wang T.
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39 (01): : 27 - 33
  • [2] Development of an adaptive infill criterion for constrained multi-objective asynchronous surrogate-based optimization
    Jolan Wauters
    Andy Keane
    Joris Degroote
    Journal of Global Optimization, 2020, 78 : 137 - 160
  • [3] Development of an adaptive infill criterion for constrained multi-objective asynchronous surrogate-based optimization
    Wauters, Jolan
    Keane, Andy
    Degroote, Joris
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 78 (01) : 137 - 160
  • [4] Expected Improvement versus Predicted Value in Surrogate-Based Optimization
    Rehbach, Frederik
    Zaefferer, Martin
    Naujoks, Boris
    Bartz-Beielstein, Thomas
    GECCO'20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2020, : 868 - 876
  • [5] Surrogate-based global optimization using an adaptive switching infill sampling criterion for expensive black-box functions
    In-Bum Chung
    Dohyun Park
    Dong-Hoon Choi
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57 : 1443 - 1459
  • [6] Surrogate-based global optimization using an adaptive switching infill sampling criterion for expensive black-box functions
    Chung, In-Bum
    Park, Dohyun
    Choi, Dong-Hoon
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 57 (04) : 1443 - 1459
  • [7] Surrogate-Based Infill Optimization Applied to Electromagnetic Problems
    Couckuyt, I.
    Declercq, F.
    Dhaene, T.
    Rogier, H.
    Knockaert, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RF AND MICROWAVE COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 2010, 20 (05) : 492 - 501
  • [8] Aerodynamic and Stealth Integrated Design of DSI Inlet by Surrogate-Based Multi-Objective Optimization with EHVI Infill Criterion
    Fan H.
    Zhan H.
    Cheng S.
    Mi B.
    Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2019, 37 (05): : 918 - 927
  • [9] Infill sampling criteria for surrogate-based optimization with constraint handling
    Parr, J. M.
    Keane, A. J.
    Forrester, A. I. J.
    Holden, C. M. E.
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 44 (10) : 1147 - 1166
  • [10] Enhancing infill sampling criteria for surrogate-based constrained optimization
    Parr, James M.
    Forrester, Alexander I. J.
    Keane, Andy J.
    Holden, Carren M. E.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 12 (1-2) : 25 - 45