Democracy as Intellectual Taste? Pluralism in Democratic Theory

被引:1
|
作者
Dufek, Pavel [1 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Fac Social Studies, Jostova 10, Brno 60200, Czech Republic
关键词
cognitive diversity; deep diversity; democracy; democratic theory; meta-consensus; peer disagreement; public justification; EPISTEMIC DEMOCRACY; POLITICAL-THEORY; DISAGREEMENT; PHILOSOPHY; CONSENSUS; SCIENCE; VOLUME; SMART;
D O I
10.1080/08913811.2018.1560669
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The normative and metanormative pluralism that figure among core self-descriptions of democratic theory, which seem incompatible with democratic theorists' practical ambitions, may stem from the internal logic of research traditions in the social sciences and humanities and from the conceptual structure of political theory itself. One way to deal productively with intradisciplinary diversity is to appeal to the idea of a meta-consensus; another is to appeal to the argument from cognitive diversity that fuels recent work on epistemic democracy. For different reasons, both strategies fail, such that a metatheoretical step-aside may be desirable, one that entails modeling democratic theory after the public justification approach.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 255
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条