Developing Creativity Competency of Engineers

被引:0
|
作者
Waychal, Pradeep Kashinath [1 ]
机构
[1] Pune Innovat Ctr, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Creativity; Index of Learning Styles (ILS); Active Learning; Wikipedia; THINKING; INDEX;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The complete agreement of all stakeholders on the importance of developing the creativity competency of engineering graduates motivated us to undertake this study. We chose a senior-level course in Software Testing and Quality Assurance which offered an excellent platform for the experiment as both testing and quality assurance activities can be executed using either routine or mechanical methods or highly creative ones. The earlier attempts reported in literature to develop the creativity competency do not appear to be systematic i.e. they do not follow the measurement ->action plan ->measurement cycle. The measurements, wherever done, are based on the Torrance Test of Critical Thinking (TTCT) and the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). We found these tests costly and decided to search for an appropriate alternative that led us to the Felder Solomon Index of Learning Style (ILS). The Sensing / Intuition dimension of the ILS, like MBTI, is originated in Carl Jung's Theory of Psychological Types. Since a number of MBTI studies have used the dimension for assessing creativity, we posited that the same ILS dimension could be used to measure the competency. We carried out pre-ILS assessment, designed and delivered the course with a variety of activities that could potentially enhance creativity, and carried out course-end post-ILS assessment. Although major changes would not normally be expected after a one-semester course, a hypothesis in the study was that a shift from sensing toward intuition on learning style profiles would be observed, and indeed it was. A paired t-test indicated that the pre-post change in the average sensing/intuition preference score was statistically significant (p = 0.004). While more research and direct assessment of competency is needed to be able to draw definitive conclusions about both the use of the instrument for measuring creativity and the efficacy of the course structure and contents in developing the competency, the results suggest that the approach is worth exploring.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEVELOPING CREATIVITY IN ENGINEERS
    LARSON, RH
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1977, 99 (08) : 29 - 31
  • [2] Developing Communication Competency for Engineers: The Case of the Hydropower Sector in Bhutan
    Zangmo G.
    Phuntshok D.T.
    IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2024, 52 (02): : 16 - 19
  • [3] CREATIVITY AND ENGINEERS
    Allan, Graham
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2014, 110 (02) : 4 - 4
  • [4] The interaction between personal and situational factors in developing future engineers' creativity
    Titu, Aurel Mihail
    Pirnau, Claudiu
    Pirnau, Mironela
    21ST INNOVATIVE MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING & ENERGY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE - IMANE&E 2017, 2017, 112
  • [5] TEACHER COMPETENCY IN CREATIVITY
    WILLIAMS, FE
    ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 1968, 68 (04): : 199 - 205
  • [6] Assessing creativity in engineers
    Larson, Michael C.
    Thomas, Benjamin H.
    Leviness, Peter O.
    American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Design Engineering Division (Publication) DE, 1999, 102 : 1 - 6
  • [7] OF TEACHERS, ENGINEERS, AND CREATIVITY
    PAUL, NR
    IEEE SPECTRUM, 1991, 28 (05) : 20 - 20
  • [8] Competency Framework for Software Engineers
    Gamaliel Rivera-Ibarra, Jose
    Rodriguez-Jacobo, Josefina
    Alberto Fernandez-Zepeda, Jose
    Serrano-Vargas, Miguel Angel
    23RD ANNUAL IEEE-CS CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND TRAINING (CSEET 2010), 2010, : 33 - 40
  • [9] Understanding creativity competency for organizational learning A study of employees' assumptions on creativity competency in creative industry
    Lau, Kung Wong
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 35 (10) : 1198 - 1218
  • [10] PATTERNS OF CREATIVITY IN BUDDING ENGINEERS
    AKINBOYE, JO
    JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 1981, 15 (01): : 67 - 68