Hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke: Is it time to re-evaluate our understanding?

被引:14
|
作者
Reshi, Rwoof [1 ]
Streib, Chris [1 ]
Ezzeddine, Mustapha [1 ]
Biros, Michelle [1 ]
Miller, Benjamin [1 ]
Lakshminarayan, Kamakshi [1 ]
Anderson, David [1 ]
Ardelt, Agnieszka [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
ANEURYSMAL SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; INFARCT SIZE; INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS; POSTSTROKE HYPERGLYCEMIA; CEREBRAL INFARCTION; TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; INSULIN; TPA;
D O I
10.1016/j.mehy.2017.08.017
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Among 700,000 new and recurrent ischemic stroke patients per year, forty percent are hyperglycemic on admission. In-vitro, hyperglycemia is toxic to neurons. Acute ischemic stroke patients who are hyperglycemic on admission experience higher morbidity and mortality. Results of multiple trials have provided no evidence supporting benefit in achieving normoglycemia. On the contrary, there is some evidence that tight glycemic control in acute brain injury is associated with poor outcome. Current consensus derived guidelines from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association recommend an upper limit of blood glucose of 140-180 mg/dl, as there is no evidence to support strict control. The lack of improved outcomes with normoglycemia in this population dictates reconsideration of assumptions regarding the underlying pathophysiology of hyperglycemia. Review of the current data suggests there are two distinct pathophysiologic entities of hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke patients: diabetic and non-diabetic. We propose that the lack of positive results from well-designed intention-to-treat trials in hyperglycemic acute ischemic stroke patients could be attributed to treating these distinct groups as one.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 80
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: 'Lost in Translation: Time to Re-evaluate Our Definitions'
    Grobben, R. B.
    Nathoe, H. M.
    van Klei, W. A.
    de Borst, G. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 52 (02) : 270 - 270
  • [2] Lost in Translation: Time to Re-evaluate Our Definitions
    Moris, D.
    Kakkos, S.
    Georgopoulos, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 52 (02) : 269 - 270
  • [3] Mumps vaccine: Is it time to re-evaluate our approach?
    Gemmill, Ian M.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2006, 175 (05) : 491 - 492
  • [4] Gait Rehabilitation After Stroke Should We Re-Evaluate Our Practice?
    Cirstea, Carmen M.
    STROKE, 2020, 51 (10) : 2892 - 2894
  • [5] Is it Time to Re-Evaluate Our Experimental Approach to Studying Diffuse Podocytopathies?
    Watts, Andrew J. B.
    Weins, Astrid
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 33 (11): : 1959 - 1960
  • [6] WE MUST RE-EVALUATE OUR FUNCTIONS
    KRYGAR, C
    MENTAL HOSPITALS, 1964, 15 (03): : 139 - &
  • [7] Time to re-evaluate Cochrane reviews?
    Browning, George G.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 31 (06) : 487 - 487
  • [8] Is it Time to Re-evaluate the Treatment of Pemphigus?
    Leventhal, Jonathan S.
    Sanchez, Miguel R.
    JOURNAL OF DRUGS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 11 (10) : 1200 - 1206
  • [9] Is it time to re-evaluate TRALI serology?
    Fung, Y
    Naidu, A
    Minchinton, RM
    TRANSFUSION, 2005, 45 (03) : 114A - 115A
  • [10] Redefining disease definitions and preventing overdiagnosis: time to re-evaluate our priorities
    Heneghan, Carl
    Mahtani, Kamal R.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2019, 24 (05) : 163 - 164