Boom or bust? Mapping out the known unknowns of global shale gas production potential

被引:13
|
作者
Hilaire, Jerome [1 ]
Bauer, Nico [1 ]
Brecha, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
Shale gas; Extraction cost curve; Global; ERR;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To assess the global production costs of shale gas, we combine global top-down data with detailed bottom-up information. Studies solely based on top-down approaches do not adequately account for the heterogeneity of shale gas deposits and hence, are unlikely to appropriately capture the extraction costs of shale gas. We design and provide an expedient bottom-up method based on publicly available US data to compute the levelized costs of shale gas extraction. Our results indicate the existence of economically attractive areas but also reveal a dramatic cost increase as lower-quality reservoirs are exploited. At the global level, our best estimate suggests that, at a cost of 6 US$/GJ, only 39% of the technically recoverable resources reported in top-down studies should be considered economically recoverable. This estimate increases to about 77% when considering an optimistic recovery of resources but could be lower than 12% when considering pessimistic ones. The current lack of information on the heterogeneity of shale gas deposits as well as on the development of future production technologies leads to significant uncertainties regarding recovery rates and production costs. Much of this uncertainty may be inherent, but for energy-system planning purposes, with or without climate change mitigation policies, it is crucial to recognize the full ranges of recoverable quantities and costs. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 587
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Energy Shale gas boom or bust?
    Burke, Maria
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 2013, 77 (06) : 7 - 7
  • [2] From Boom to Bust? A Critical Look at US Shale Gas Projections
    Richter, Philipp M.
    ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2015, 4 (01) : 131 - 151
  • [3] Exporting global warming? Coal trade and the shale gas boom
    Knittel, Christopher R.
    Metaxoglou, Konstantinos
    Soderbery, Anson
    Trindade, Andre
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2022, 55 (03): : 1294 - 1333
  • [4] US liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports: Boom or bust for the global climate?
    Gilbert, Alexander Q.
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    ENERGY, 2017, 141 : 1671 - 1680
  • [5] Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions
    O'Sullivan, Francis
    Paltsev, Sergey
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [6] Well production profiles assess Fayetteville shale gas potential
    Mason, James E.
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2011, 109 (11) : 76 - +
  • [7] Does the shale gas boom change the natural gas price-production relationship? Evidence from the US market
    Feng, Gen-Fu
    Wang, Quan-Jing
    Chu, Yin
    Wen, Jun
    Chang, Chun-Ping
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 93
  • [8] Nanopore Structure and Fractal Characteristics of Lacustrine Shale: Implications for Shale Gas Storage and Production Potential
    Chen, Lei
    Jiang, Zhenxue
    Jiang, Shu
    Liu, Keyu
    Yang, Wei
    Tan, Jingqiang
    Gao, Fenglin
    NANOMATERIALS, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [9] Evaluating production potential of mature US oil, gas shale plays
    Sandrea, Rafael
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2012, 110 (12) : 58 - +
  • [10] Prediction of gas production potential based on machine learning in shale gas field: a case study
    Zhai, Shuo
    Geng, Shaoyang
    Li, Chengyong
    Gong, Yufeng
    Jing, Min
    Li, Yao
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2022, 44 (03) : 6581 - 6601