Comparison of analytical methods for antibody conjugates with application in nuclear imaging - Report from the trenches

被引:3
|
作者
Feiner, Irene V. J. [1 ]
Longo, Beatrice [2 ]
Gomez-Vallejo, Vanessa [1 ]
Calvo, Javier [1 ]
Chomet, Marion [3 ]
Vugts, Danielle J. [3 ]
Windhorst, Albert D. [3 ]
Padro, Daniel [1 ]
Zanda, Matteo [2 ,4 ]
Rejc, Luka [5 ]
Llop, Jordi [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Basque Res & Technol Alliance BRTA, CIC BiomaGUNE, Paseo Miramon 182, San Sebastian 20014, Spain
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Kosterlitz Ctr Therapeut, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1085c, NL-1117 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] CNR SCITEC, Via Mancinelli 7, I-20131 Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Chem & Chem Technol, Vecna Pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[6] Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Resp CIBERES, Madrid, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Antibody; MALDI; LCMS; Titration; Conjugate; PET; Positron Emission Tomography; Nuclear imaging; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES; CLICK CHEMISTRY; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES; PET;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.08.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used in nuclear imaging. Radiolabelling with positron emitting radionuclides, typically radiometals, requires the incorporation of a bifunctional chelator for the formation of the radiometal-mAb complex. Additionally, mAbs can be conjugated with small molecules capable to undergo bioorthogonal click reactions in vivo, enabling pre-targeting strategies. The determination of the number of functionalities attached to the mAb is critically important to ensure a good labelling yield or to guarantee pretargeting efficacy. In this work, we compare three different analytical methods for the assessment of average functionalisation and heterogeneity of the conjugated mAbs. Methods: Two selected mAbs (Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab) were randomly conjugated through lysine residues with 3-10 equivalents p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine (p-NCS-Bz-DFO) or 20-200 equivalents trans-cyclooctene-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (TCO-NHS). The DFO- or TCO-to-mAb ratio were determined using three different methods: direct titration (radiometric for DFO-conjugated mAbs, photometric for TCOconjugated mAbs), MALDI/TOF MS mass analysis (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry), and UPLC/ESI-TOF MS mass analysis (Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography/ Electrospray Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry). Results: Radiometric and photometric titrations provided information on the average number of DFO and TCO functionalities per mAb respectively. MALDI/TOF MS provided equivalent results to those obtained by titration, although investigation of the heterogeneity of the resulting mixture was challenging and inaccurate. UPLC/ESITOF MS resulted in good peak resolution in the case of DFO-conjugated mAbs, where an accurate discrimination of the contribution ofmono-, di- and tri-substituted mAbs could be achieved bymathematical fitting of the spectra. However, UPLC/ESI-TOFMS was unable to discriminate between different conjugates when the smaller TCO moiety was attached to the mAbs. Conclusions: The three techniques offered comparable results in terms of determining the average number of conjugates per mAb. Additionally, UPLC/ESI-TOF MS was able to shed a light on the heterogeneity of the resulting functionalised mAbs, especially in the case of DFO-conjugated mAbs. Finally, while using a single analytical method might not be a reliable way to determine the average functionalisation and assess the heterogeneity of the sample, a combination of thesemethods could substantially improve the characterization of mAb conjugates. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 33
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF PREPARING ENZYME-ANTIBODY CONJUGATES - APPLICATION OF THESE CONJUGATES FOR ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY
    OSULLIVAN, MJ
    GNEMMI, E
    MORRIS, D
    CHIEREGATTI, G
    SIMMONDS, AD
    SIMMONS, M
    BRIDGES, JW
    MARKS, V
    ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1979, 100 (01) : 100 - 108
  • [2] Analytical methods for physicochemical characterization of antibody drug conjugates
    Wakankar, Aditya
    Chen, Yan
    Gokarn, Yatin
    Jacobson, Fredric S.
    MABS, 2011, 3 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [3] A COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR THE PREPARATION OF ENZYME ANTIBODY CONJUGATES
    HALLIDAY, MI
    WISDOM, GB
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 1986, 14 (02) : 473 - 474
  • [4] Analytical tools for antibody-drug conjugates: From in vitro to in vivo
    Liu, Tong
    Tao, Yiran
    Xia, Xuhan
    Zhang, Ya
    Deng, Ruijie
    Wang, Yuxi
    TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 152
  • [5] Analytical Comparison of Antibody-drug Conjugates Based on Good Manufacturing Practice Strategies
    Zhala Tawfiq
    Yutaka Matsuda
    Melody Jane Alfonso
    Colin Clancy
    Veronica Robles
    Monica Leung
    Brian A. Mendelsohn
    Analytical Sciences, 2020, 36 : 871 - 875
  • [6] Analytical Comparison of Antibody-drug Conjugates Based on Good Manufacturing Practice Strategies
    Tawfiq, Zhala
    Matsuda, Yutaka
    Alfonso, Melody Jane
    Clancy, Colin
    Robles, Veronica
    Leung, Monica
    Mendelsohn, Brian A.
    ANALYTICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 36 (07) : 871 - 875
  • [7] Analytical technique for the comparison of paper formation imaging methods
    Pawlak, JJ
    Keller, DS
    JOURNAL OF PULP AND PAPER SCIENCE, 2001, 27 (05): : 171 - 176
  • [8] Analytical technique for the comparison of paper formation imaging methods
    Pawlak, J.J.
    Keller, D.S.
    2001, Pulp and Paper Technical Association of Canada (27):
  • [9] Comparison of three different methods of analytical imaging of the stable isotopes of nitrogen for application to plant studies
    Massiot, P.
    Sommer, F.
    Gojon, A.
    Grignon, N.
    Lefebvre, F.
    Thellier, M.
    Ripoll, C.
    Journal of Trace and Microprobe Techniques, 1994, 12 (03):
  • [10] Comparison of three different methods of analytical imaging of the stable isotopes of nitrogen for application to plant studies
    Massiot, P.
    Sommer, F.
    Gojon, A.
    Grignon, N.
    Lefebvre, F.
    Thellier, M.
    Ripoll, C.
    Journal of Trace and Microprobe Techniques, 1993, (59):