Quality of the record of patient assessment in geriatric units: contribution of a structured medical record

被引:0
|
作者
Belmin, J [1 ]
de la Fourniere, F
Bellot, P
Medjahed, S
Sibony-Prat, J
Bojic, N
Salahshour, M
Bruhat, A
机构
[1] Hop Rene Muret Bigottini, Serv Med Interne Geriatr, F-93270 Sevran, France
[2] Univ Paris 13, Sevran, France
[3] Ctr Jean Vignalou, Serv Med Interne Geriatr, Pau, France
来源
PRESSE MEDICALE | 1998年 / 27卷 / 30期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The medical record (MR) is a key document for hospitalized patients. Several audits have however demonstrated that much important information is often missing in hospital MR We conducted this survey with the aim of improving the quality of MR in a geriatric unit PATIENTS AND METHODS: A structured MR was elaborated and implemented in order to guide and record the assessment of patients admitted in our geriatric ward. MR of 54 consecutive patients admitted after implementation of the structured MR were studied and compared to those of 108 consecutive patients admitted on the preceeding year (classical MR). Quality of data collected at admission was assessed using a 33-item guide, proposed by 3 experts in geriatric medicine unaware of the structured MR studies. For each item, a binary score (present/ absent) and a precision score were used. A validation study was conducted using the same methods in another geriatric ward which has not participated to development of the structured charts MR studied. RESULTS: For most items studied, information was present in a significantly higher proportion in structured MR than in classical MR Likewise, the precision score was significantly higher in structured MR. The validation survey found analogous results. CONCLUSION: Use of a structured MR significantly improves the quality of data collection at admission in geriatric units. This improvement appears to be related more to the use of the structured MR than the effect of developping a new tool.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1522
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STRUCTURED IMPLICIT REVIEW OF THE MEDICAL RECORD - A NEW METHOD OF QUALITY ASSESSMENT
    RUBENSTEIN, LV
    KAHN, K
    REINISCH, EJ
    SHERWOOD, M
    ROGERS, WH
    BROOK, RH
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (02): : A324 - A324
  • [2] Importance of Quality of Medical Record: Differences in Patient Safety Incident Inquiry Results According to Assessment for Quality of Medical Record
    Jeong, Hyeran
    Choi, Eun Young
    Lee, Won
    Jang, Seung Gyeong
    Pyo, Jeehee
    Ock, Minsu
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2024, 20 (04) : 229 - 235
  • [3] PATIENT MEDICAL RECORD AS A DATABASE
    JONES, BE
    OULD, MA
    COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1974, 17 (04): : 295 - 301
  • [4] Impact of Patient Load on the Quality of Electronic Medical Record Documentation
    Jacob, Aasems
    Raj, Rishi
    Alagusundaramoorthy, Sayee
    Wei, Jing
    Wu, Jianrong
    Eng, Margaret
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 8
  • [5] QUALITY OF DATA IN MEDICAL RECORD
    FEINSTEIN, AR
    COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1970, 3 (05): : 426 - +
  • [6] QUALITY CONTROL AND MEDICAL RECORD
    WEED, LL
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1971, 127 (01) : 101 - &
  • [7] The integrated medical record: DICOM structured reporting
    Kernberg, M
    Bidgood, WD
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1999, : 1097 - 1097
  • [8] ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF EMERGENCY CARE - THE MEDICAL RECORD VERSUS PATIENT OUTCOME
    MURPHY, JG
    JACOBSON, S
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1984, 13 (03) : 158 - 165
  • [9] The electronic medical record in anesthesiology: a standard of quality healthcare and patient safety
    Tanoubi, Issam
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2017, 64 (07): : 693 - 697
  • [10] Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record
    Miller, DL
    Balter, S
    Wagner, LK
    Cardella, J
    Clark, TWI
    Neithamer, CD
    Schwartzberg, MS
    Swan, TL
    Towbin, RB
    Rholl, KS
    Sacks, D
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (05) : 423 - 429