Rethinking patient involvement in healthcare priority setting

被引:8
|
作者
Sandman, Lars [1 ]
Hofmann, Bjorn [2 ]
Bognar, Greg [3 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Natl Ctr Prior Hlth, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU Gjovik, Dept Hlth Sci, Gjovik, Norway
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Philosophy, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
deliberative democracy; empowerment; legitimacy; patient involvement; priority setting; rationing; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; ALLOCATION; LEGITIMACY; CRITERIA; ORGANIZATIONS; ECONOMY; JUSTICE; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1111/bioe.12730
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
With healthcare systems under pressure from scarcity of resources and ever-increasing demand for services, difficult priority setting choices need to be made. At the same time, increased attention to patient involvement in a wide range of settings has given rise to the idea that those who are eventually affected by priority setting decisions should have a say in those decisions. In this paper, we investigate arguments for the inclusion of patient representatives in priority setting bodies at the policy level. We find that the standard justifications for patient representation, such as to achieve patient-relevant decisions, empowerment of patients, securing legitimacy of decisions, and the analogy with democracy, all fall short of supporting patient representation in this context. We conclude by briefly outlining an alternative proposal for patient participation that involves patient consultants.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 411
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting
    Rand, Leah
    Dunn, Michael
    Slade, Ingrid
    Upadhyaya, Sheela
    Sheehan, Mark
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [2] Is a larger patient benefit always better in healthcare priority setting?
    Sandman, Lars
    Liliemark, Jan
    Gustavsson, Erik
    Henriksson, Martin
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2024, 27 (03) : 349 - 357
  • [3] Understanding and using patient experiences as evidence in healthcare priority setting
    Leah Rand
    Michael Dunn
    Ingrid Slade
    Sheela Upadhyaya
    Mark Sheehan
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 17
  • [4] Incommensurability and healthcare priority setting
    Herlitz, Anders
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2024, 181 (12) : 3347 - 3365
  • [5] International experiences with priority setting in healthcare
    Bert Gordijn
    Henk ten Have
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2013, 16 : 325 - 326
  • [6] International experiences with priority setting in healthcare
    Gordijn, Bert
    ten Have, Henk
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 16 (03) : 325 - 326
  • [7] Priority-setting in Finnish healthcare
    Rissanen, P
    Häkkinen, U
    HEALTH POLICY, 1999, 50 (1-2) : 143 - 153
  • [8] Patient Safety: A Priority for Healthcare and for Healthcare Design
    Stichler, Jaynelle F.
    HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL, 2016, 9 (04) : 10 - 15
  • [9] Sharing space at the research table: exploring public and patient involvement in a methodology priority setting partnership
    Burke N.N.
    Stewart D.
    Tierney T.
    Worrall A.
    Smith M.
    Elliott J.
    Beecher C.
    Devane D.
    Biesty L.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 9 (1)
  • [10] Patient priority setting in HIV ageing research: exploring the feasibility of community engagement and involvement in Tanzania
    Clarke E.
    Anderson-Saria G.
    Kisoli A.
    Urasa S.
    Moloney S.
    Safic S.
    Rogathi J.
    Walker R.
    Robinson L.
    Paddick S.-M.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 9 (1)