Indicators for technological, environmental and economic sustainability of ozone contactors

被引:25
|
作者
Zhang, Jie [1 ]
Tejada-Martinez, Andres E. [1 ]
Lei, Hongxia [2 ]
Zhang, Qiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4202 E Fowler Ave,ENB 118, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] City Tampa Water Dept, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
Disinfection; Environmental sustainability; Cost estimation; Indicator; Computational fluid dynamics; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS; INACTIVATION; FLOW; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Various studies have attempted to improve disinfection efficiency as a way to improve the sustainability of ozone disinfection which is a critical unit process for water treatment. Baffling factor, CT10, and log inactivation are commonly used indicators for quantifying disinfection credits. However the applicability of these indicators and the relationship between these indicators have not been investigated in depth. This study simulated flow, tracer transport, and chemical species transport in a full-scale ozone contactor operated by the City of Tampa Water Department and six other modified designs using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Through analysis of the simulation results, we found that baffling factor and CT10 are not optimal indicators of disinfection performance. We also found that the relationship between effluent CT obtained from CT transport simulation and baffling factor depends on the location of ozone release. In addition, we analyzed the environmental and economic impacts of ozone contactor designs and upgrades and developed a composite indicator to quantify the sustainability in technological, environmental and economic dimensions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 616
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indicators for environmental and economic sustainability on UK dairy farms
    Jewkes, EC
    Scholefield, D
    Turner, MM
    Brown, L
    CONTROLLING NITROGEN FLOWS AND LOSSES, 2004, : 510 - 512
  • [2] Environmental sustainability indicators in universities: a tool for identifying and evaluating technological solutions
    Leiva Mas, Jorge
    Rodriguez Rico, Ivan L.
    Martinez Nodal, Pastora
    AFINIDAD, 2012, 69 (558) : 120 - 125
  • [3] Integration of sustainability indicators: the contribution of integrated economic and environmental accounting
    Willmann, R
    MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2000, 51 (05) : 501 - 511
  • [4] Water use model for quantifying environmental and economic sustainability indicators
    Sahely, Halla R.
    Kennedy, Christopher A.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 133 (06) : 550 - 559
  • [5] CRITERIA AND INDICATORS FOR ASSESSING THE ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY OF THE SYSTEM
    Guseva, N. G.
    JOURNAL OF MINING INSTITUTE, 2006, 167 (01): : 231 - 233
  • [6] The Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators: On population weighted ground-level ozone
    Rastan, Soheil
    Dong, Lauren
    Lawrence, Joe St.
    Haghighat, Fariborz
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILDING ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, PROCEEDINGS VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 1007 - 1012
  • [7] Indicators for environmental sustainability
    Dong, Yan
    Hauschild, Michael Z.
    24TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2017, 61 : 697 - 702
  • [8] SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ON THE CROSSROADS + SUSTAINABILITY OF CIVILIZATION, ECONOMIC, TECHNOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS
    LETASI, J
    FILOZOFIA, 1996, 51 (02): : 70 - 79
  • [9] Economic sustainability, environmental sustainability and constructability indicators related to concrete- and steel-projects
    Zhong, Yun
    Wu, Peng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 108 : 748 - 756
  • [10] Natural resources, economic growth, and environmental sustainability in China: the role of technological innovation
    Xiong, Juan-Juan
    Zheng, Li-ping
    Wang, Chang-song
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 68 (06) : 1472 - 1495