Codesign and development of a primary school based pathway for child anxiety screening and intervention delivery: a protocol, mixed-methods feasibility study

被引:12
|
作者
Williamson, Victoria [1 ,2 ]
Larkin, Michael [3 ]
Reardon, Tessa [1 ]
Pearcey, Samantha [1 ]
Hill, Claire [4 ]
Stallard, Paul [5 ]
Spence, Susan H. [6 ]
Breen, Maria [4 ]
Macdonald, Ian [7 ]
Ukoumunne, Obioha [8 ]
Ford, Tamsin [9 ]
Violato, Mara [10 ]
Sniehotta, Falko [11 ]
Stainer, Jason [12 ]
Gray, Alastair [10 ]
Brown, Paul [13 ]
Sancho, Michelle [14 ]
Creswell, Cathy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Anna Watts Bldg, Oxford, Oxon, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, London, England
[3] Aston Univ, Aston Neurosci Inst, Dept Psychol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Reading, Sch Psychol & Clin Language Sci, Reading, Berks, England
[5] Univ Bath, Bath, Avon, England
[6] Griffith Univ, 16 Russell St South Bank, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[7] Charlie Waller Mem Trust, Rear Off, First Floor, Thatcham, England
[8] Univ Exeter, NIHR ARC South West Peninsula, Exeter, Devon, England
[9] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
[10] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Richard Doll Bldg,Old Rd Campus, Oxford, England
[11] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Baddiley Clark Bldg,Richardson Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[12] Stanley Primary Sch, Strathmore Rd, London, England
[13] Bransgore C E Primary Sch, Ringwood Rd, Christchurch, New Zealand
[14] West Berkshire Council, Council Off, Market St, Newbury, Berks, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
anxiety disorders; protocols & guidelines; mental health; child & adolescent psychiatry; qualitative research; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; DISORDERS; PROGRAM; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044852
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Anxiety difficulties are among the most common mental health problems in childhood. Despite this, few children access evidence-based interventions, and school may be an ideal setting to improve children's access to treatment. This article describes the design, methods and expected data collection of the Identifying Child Anxiety Through Schools - Identification to Intervention (iCATS i2i) study, which aims to develop acceptable school-based procedures to identify and support child anxiety difficulties. Methods and analysis iCATS i2i will use a mixed-methods approach to codesign and deliver a set of procedures-or 'pathway'-to improve access to evidence-based intervention for child anxiety difficulties through primary schools in England. The study will consist of four stages, initially involving in-depth interviews with parents, children, school staff and stakeholders (stage 1) to inform the development of the pathway. The pathway will then be administered in two primary schools, including screening, feedback to parents and the offer of treatment where indicated (stage 2), with participating children, parents and school staff invited to provide feedback on their experience (stages 3 and 4). Data will be analysed using Template Analysis. Ethics and dissemination The iCATS i2i study was approved by the University of Oxford's Research Ethics Committee (REF R64620/RE001). It is expected that this codesign study will lead on to a future feasibility study and, if indicated, a randomised controlled trial. The findings will be disseminated in several ways, including via lay summary report, publication in academic journals and presentation at conferences. By providing information on child, parent, school staff and other stakeholder's experiences, we anticipate that the findings will inform the development of an acceptable evidence-based pathway for identification and intervention for children with anxiety difficulties in primary schools and may also inform broader approaches to screening for and treating youth mental health problems outside of clinics.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] School-based screening for childhood anxiety problems and intervention delivery: a codesign approach
    Williamson, Victoria
    Larkin, Michael
    Reardon, Tessa
    Pearcey, Samantha
    Button, Roberta
    Green, Iheoma
    Hill, Claire
    Stallard, Paul
    Spence, Susan H.
    Breen, Maria
    Mcdonald, Ian
    Ukoumunne, Obioha
    Ford, Tamsin
    Violato, Mara
    Sniehotta, Falko
    Stainer, Jason
    Gray, Alastair
    Brown, Paul
    Sancho, Michelle
    Morgan, Fran
    Jasper, Bec
    Creswell, Cathy
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [2] Risk reduction intervention for raised blood pressure (REVERSE): protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study
    Hives, Lucy
    Georgiou, Rachel F.
    Spencer, Joseph
    Benedetto, Valerio
    Clegg, Andrew
    Rutter, Paul
    Watkins, Caroline
    Williams, Nefyn
    Bray, Emma P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [3] Integrated child nutrition, parenting, and health intervention in rural Liberia: A mixed-methods feasibility study
    Isanovic, Sejla
    Sanoe, Musa
    Wooten, Shelbie
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    Yousafzai, Aisha K.
    Blake, Christine E.
    Kanyangarara, Mufaro
    Swan, Melanie
    Rodger, Nicole
    Murray, Miriam
    Larson, Leila M.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12):
  • [4] Nature videos for PTSD: protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study
    Knaust, Thiemo
    Felnhofer, Anna
    Kothgassner, Oswald David
    Reinke, Max
    Browning, Matthew
    Hoellmer, Helge
    Schulz, Holger
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 13 (02)
  • [5] Impact of financial incentives on alcohol intervention delivery in primary care: a mixed-methods study
    Amy O’Donnell
    Catherine Haighton
    David Chappel
    Colin Shevills
    Eileen Kaner
    BMC Family Practice, 17
  • [6] Impact of financial incentives on alcohol intervention delivery in primary care: a mixed-methods study
    O'Donnell, Amy
    Haighton, Catherine
    Chappel, David
    Shevills, Colin
    Kaner, Eileen
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 17 : 1 - 10
  • [7] Is an opportunistic primary care-based intervention for non-responders to bowel screening feasible and acceptable? A mixed-methods feasibility study in Scotland
    Calanzani, Natalia
    Cavers, Debbie
    Vojt, Gabriele
    Orbell, Sheina
    Steele, Robert J. C.
    Brownlee, Linda
    Smith, Steve
    Patnick, Julietta
    Weller, David
    Campbell, Christine
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):
  • [8] Development and evaluation of the IPLAY program: A protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study targeting newcomer youth
    Kwan, Matthew Y. W.
    Kandasamy, Sujane
    Graham, Jeffrey
    Konopaki, Jennifer
    Brown, Denver M. Y.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (04):
  • [9] Use and impact of social prescribing: a mixed-methods feasibility study protocol
    Jani, Anant
    Liyanage, Harshana
    Hoang, Uy
    Moore, Lucy
    Ferreira, Filipa
    Yonova, Ivelina
    Tzortziou Brown, Victoria
    de Lusignan, Simon
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [10] Integration of child life into adult oncology: A mixed-methods feasibility study
    Lysecki, David L.
    Bainbridge, Daryl
    Akitt, Tracy
    Georgiou, Georgia
    McKean, Heather
    Meyer, Ralph M.
    Sussman, Jonathan
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 33 (06)