RISK IN EVALUATION OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC CONTRACTS. EMPIRICAL RESEARCH FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC

被引:0
|
作者
Vrbova, Lucie [1 ]
Hajek, Jiri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ, Dept Management, Fac Business Adm, Nam W Churchilla 4, Prague 13067 3, Czech Republic
关键词
Public contracts; risk; evaluation criteria; contractor selection; CRITERIA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Public contracts especially construction works are connected with high risks. Previous research shows a significant number of contracts with higher costs than expected and delays. Theory of decision making offers a variety of approaches to incorporate risks into decisions: adding criteria measuring risks; assessment of the risk of two best options; determining stochastic consequences of alternatives using decision trees, payoff matrixes, scenarios or Monte Carlo simulation or calculation of costs of preventive and contingency actions. Public contracting entities have limited possibilities to use these approaches due to legal requirements such as transparency, the order of steps while contracting etc. The aim of the paper is to identify possibilities of risk incorporation into an evaluation of bids in public contracts and analysis of the behaviour of public contracting entities from the perspective of risk incorporation. The research was conducted on contracts for construction works in the Czech Republic. The data show that contracting entities used the criteria as sanctions, guarantees, warranty period etc. transferring risks on contractors.
引用
收藏
页码:1808 / 1816
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PRICE AS THE ONLY CRITERION TO EVALUATE BIDS FOR PUBLIC CONTRACTS. FINDINGS FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC
    Hajek, Jiri
    Vrbova, Lucie
    Kolis, Karel
    POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM, VOL I, 2014, : 303 - 309
  • [2] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IMPORTANCE OF PRICE AND NUMBER OF BIDS FOR PUBLIC CONTRACTS. EVIDENCE FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC
    Hajek, Jiri
    Vrbova, Lucie
    Kolis, Karel
    POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM, VOL I, 2014, : 335 - 342
  • [3] AN EVALUATION OF PUBLIC CONTRACTS IN TEACHING HOSPITALS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN THE YEARS FROM 2006 TO 2011
    Stanislav, Klazar
    Alena, Maaytova
    FINANCE AND THE PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE, 2013, : 348 - 357
  • [4] Public Contracts in Hospitals in Czech Republic Revised
    Klazar, Stanislav
    Maaytova, Alena
    CREATING GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES: 2020 VISION PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS 1-3, 2013, : 602 - 609
  • [5] Model Example of Small-Scale Public Contracts Evaluation in the Czech Republic
    Ticha, Alena
    Nowak, Jiri
    Mrnova, Zuzana
    3RD WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE, URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS 2018), 2019, 471
  • [6] An Empirical Analysis of Post-contractual Behaviour Regarding Public Contracts for Construction Work in the Czech Republic
    Placek, Michal
    Ochrana, Frantisek
    Schmidt, Martin
    Pucek, Milan
    NEW TRENDS IN FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2017, : 347 - 354
  • [7] The Competitive Effect on Public Procurement for Public Service Contracts: The Case of the Czech Republic
    Stehlik, Petr
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2018, 66 (04): : 416 - 427
  • [8] The impact of the choice of evaluation criteria and the type of tender on the awarding public contracts (in the case of construction contracts at the local level in the Czech Republic)
    Ochrana, Frantisek
    Hrncirova, Kristyna
    Placek, Michal
    Pucek, Milan
    18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENTERPRISE AND COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, : 636 - 646
  • [9] SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZE ENTERPRISES IN THE REGIONAL PUBLIC CONTRACTS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
    Stloukalova, Tereza
    Jurcik, Radek
    Srdosova, Kristina
    18TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON REGIONAL SCIENCES, 2015, : 143 - 147
  • [10] An Empirical Analysis of Post-Contractual Behaviour in Public Works Contracts: The Czech Case as a Secondary Comparison with the Slovak Republic
    Schmidt, Martin
    Ochrana, Frantisek
    Placek, Michal
    Pucek, Michal
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2016, 64 (06): : 501 - 518