Biochar particle size and amendment rate are more important for water retention and weight of green roof substrates than differences in feedstock type

被引:34
|
作者
Werdin, Joerg [1 ]
Conn, Richard [1 ]
Fletcher, Tim D. [1 ]
Rayner, John P. [1 ]
Williams, Nicholas S. G. [1 ]
Farrell, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Sci, Sch Ecosyst & Forest Sci, 500 Yarra Blvd, Richmond, Vic 3121, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Field capacity; Plant available water; Porosity; Water holding capacity; Weight loading; Wood density; PLANT-AVAILABLE WATER; HYDROLOGICAL PROPERTIES; STORMWATER RETENTION; GROWING MEDIA; SOIL; MOISTURE; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; CATCHMENT; QUANTITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106391
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Green roofs are an effective green infrastructure tool to reduce stormwater runoff in cities, but their considerable weight is a constraint on widespread uptake. Consequently, lightweight green roof substrates with high water retention are desirable. Biochar addition to green roof substrates may reduce green roof weight and improve stormwater retention by increasing water holding capacity. However, the effects of biochar on substrate properties can vary due to differences in biochar particle size and amendment rate that influence substrate porosity and therefore substrate water and air-content. Additionally, differences in the feedstock used to produce biochar also mean that biochars are highly variable in their internal porosity, affecting their water retention and weight. To determine how biochar particle size, amendment rate and feedstock density influence substrate water retention, bulk density, air-filled porosity and infiltration we tested substrate properties of a scoria-based green roof substrate mixed with two different biochars contrasting in feedstock type, at three different biochar particle size fractions (coarse 2 mm - 10 mm, fine <2 mm, mixed <2 mm - 10 mm) and four amendment rates (10, 20, 30, 40% v/v), and compared them with an unamended control. Biochar particle size and amendment rate influenced substrate properties more than feedstock type. Finer biochar particle size improved water retention but decreased infiltration and air-filled porosity, while larger biochar particle size moderately improved plant available water and maintained infiltration and air-filled porosity when compared with the control. Greater amendment rates reduced substrate weight regardless of particle size and feedstock type. While biochar with finer particle size can improve water retention, it also reduces air-filled porosity and infiltration, which may cause waterlogging and necessitate additional stormwater controls in locations with high rainfall intensities. Therefore, coarse biochar amendment is preferred as it improves plant available water, reduces substrate weight and ensures good drainage for plant performance. Further work is required to evaluate the effects of biochar amendment on plant growth and hydrological performance in full green roof system configurations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Green roof storage capacity can be more important than evapotranspiration for retention performance
    Zhang, Zheng
    Szota, Christopher
    Fletcher, Tim D.
    Williams, Nicholas S. G.
    Farrell, Claire
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 232 : 404 - 412
  • [2] Biochar granulation, particle size, and vegetation effects on leachate water quality from a green roof substrate
    Liao, Wenxi
    Drake, Jennifer
    Thomas, Sean C.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 318
  • [3] Impacts of Biochar Pyrolysis Temperature, Particle Size, and Application Rate on Water Retention of Loess in the Semiarid Region
    Zhang, Peizhen
    Chang, Fangling
    Huo, Lili
    Yao, Zonglu
    Luo, Juan
    WATER, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [4] A universal multifractal-based method to model pore size distribution, water retention and hydraulic conductivity of granular green roof substrates
    Ramanathan, Arun
    Versini, Pierre -Antoine
    Schertzer, Daniel
    Perrin, Remi
    Sindt, Lionel
    Tchiguirinskaia, Ioulia
    GEODERMA, 2023, 438