Critical evaluation of the human relevance of the mode of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)

被引:26
|
作者
Yamada, Tomoya [1 ]
Cohen, Samuel M. [2 ]
Lake, Brian G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sumitomo Chem Co Ltd, Environm Hlth Sci Lab, Osaka, Japan
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Microbiol, Omaha, NE USA
[3] Univ Surrey, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Guildford, Surrey, England
关键词
Cell proliferation; constitutive androstane receptor; cultured hepatocytes; mode of action; human relevance; humanized models; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha; phenobarbital; pregnane X receptor; PXB mouse; rodent liver tumors; transgenic mice; chimeric mice; PREGNANE-X-RECEPTOR; SYNTHETIC PYRETHROID METOFLUTHRIN; TRIAZOLE CONAZOLE FUNGICIDES; REPLICATIVE DNA-SYNTHESIS; NUCLEAR RECEPTOR; CELL-PROLIFERATION; BETA-CATENIN; CANCER-RISK; RAT-LIVER; SPECIES-DIFFERENCES;
D O I
10.1080/10408444.2021.1939654
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Many nongenotoxic chemicals have been shown to produce liver tumors in mice and/or rats by a mode of action (MOA) involving activation of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). Studies with phenobarbital (PB) and other compounds have identified the key events for this MOA: CAR activation; increased hepatocellular proliferation; altered foci formation; and ultimately the development of adenomas/carcinomas. In terms of human relevance, the pivotal species difference is that CAR activators are mitogenic agents in mouse and rat hepatocytes, but they do not stimulate increased hepatocellular proliferation in humans. This conclusion is supported by substantial in vitro studies with cultured rodent and human hepatocytes and also by in vivo studies with chimeric mice with human hepatocytes. Examination of the literature reveals many similarities in the hepatic effects and species differences between activators of rodent CAR and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha), with PPAR alpha activators also not being mitogenic agents in human hepatocytes. Overall, a critical analysis of the available data demonstrates that the established MOA for rodent liver tumor formation by PB and other CAR activators is qualitatively not plausible for humans. This conclusion is supported by data from several human epidemiology studies.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 394
页数:22
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Application of humanized mice to toxicology studies: Evaluation of the human relevance of the mode of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)
    Yamada, Tomoya
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2021, 34 (04) : 283 - 297
  • [2] Human relevance of rodent liver tumour formation by constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators
    Lake, Brian G.
    TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (04) : 697 - 717
  • [3] Letter to the editor regarding the review article by Yamada et al. (2021) titled "Critical evaluation of the human relevance of the mode of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)"
    van Kesteren, Petra
    Pronk, Marja
    Heusinkveld, Harm
    Luijten, Mirjam
    Hakkert, Betty
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 52 (05) : 397 - 398
  • [4] Mode of action and human relevance of rodent liver tumours produced by nongenotoxic CAR and PPARα activators
    Lake, B. G.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 295 : S46 - S46
  • [5] Mode of action analysis for pesticide-induced rodent liver tumours involving activation of the constitutive androstane receptor: relevance to human cancer risk
    Lake, Brian G.
    Price, Roger J.
    Osimitz, Thomas G.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 71 (06) : 829 - 834
  • [6] Mode of action and human relevance analysis for nuclear receptor-mediated liver toxicity: A case study with phenobarbital as a model constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activator
    Elcombe, Clifford R.
    Peffer, Richard C.
    Wolf, Douglas C.
    Bailey, Jason
    Bars, Remi
    Bell, David
    Cattley, Russell C.
    Ferguson, Stephen S.
    Geter, David
    Goetz, Amber
    Goodman, Jay I.
    Hester, Susan
    Jacobs, Abigail
    Omiecinski, Curtis J.
    Schoeny, Rita
    Xie, Wen
    Lake, Brian G.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 44 (01) : 64 - 82
  • [7] Chrysin, baicalein and galangin are indirect activators of the human constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)
    Carazo, Alejandro
    Smutny, Tomas
    Hyrsova, Lucie
    Berka, Karel
    Pavek, Petr
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 233 (02) : 68 - 77
  • [8] Role of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) in human liver cancer
    Bae, Sarah Da Won
    Nguyen, Romario
    Qiao, Liang
    George, Jacob
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER, 2021, 1875 (02):
  • [9] Mode of action analysis for fluxapyroxad-induced rat liver tumour formation: evidence for activation of the constitutive androstane receptor and assessment of human relevance
    Goettel, Manuela
    Werner, Christoph
    Honarvar, Naveed
    Groeters, Sibylle
    Fegert, Ivana
    Haines, Corinne
    Chatham, Lynsey R.
    Vardy, Audrey
    Lake, Brian G.
    TOXICOLOGY, 2024, 505
  • [10] Response to Letter to the Editor from Drs. van Kesteren, Pronk, Heusinkveld, Luijten and Hakkert concerning Yamada et al. (2021): Critical evaluation of the human relevance of the mode of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). Crit. Rev. Toxicol. Vol. 51: 373-394
    Yamada, Tomoya
    Cohen, Samuel M.
    Lake, Brian G.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 52 (05) : 399 - 402