共 8 条
Adolescents and Young Adults Have Difficulty Understanding Nicotine Concentration Labels on Vaping Products Presented as mg/mL and Percent Nicotine
被引:22
|作者:
Morean, Meghan E.
[1
]
Wackowski, Olivia A.
[2
]
Eissenberg, Thomas
[3
]
Delnevo, Cristine D.
[2
]
Krishnan-Sarin, Suchitra
[1
]
机构:
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, 34 Pk St, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
[2] Rutgers Ctr Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Psychol, Box 2018, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE USE;
UNITED-STATES;
SMOKING;
USERS;
D O I:
10.1093/ntr/ntab007
中图分类号:
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Introduction: E-cigarette e-liquid nicotine concentrations typically are labeled as mg/mL or percent nicotine. We examined whether these metrics accurately convey nicotine strength to young e-cigarette users and if youth can compare concentrations presented in mg/mL and percent nicotine. Aims and Methods: Eight hundred and twenty-one adolescent and young adult e-cigarette users participated in the survey. Participants rated nicotine concentration strengths presented as mg/mL (0-60 mg/mL) and percent nicotine (0%-6%) from "no nicotine" to "very high nicotine." Participants also viewed pairs of nicotine concentrations (eg, 18 mg/mL vs. 5%) and indicated which concentration was stronger or if the concentrations were equivalent. Results: On average, participants correctly identified 5.92 (2.68) of 18 nicotine strengths, correctly identifying strengths labeled as mg/mL (3.47 [2.03]) more often than percent nicotine (2.45 [1.38], p < .001). Excluding nicotine-free, participants rated concentrations presented as mg/mL as stronger, more addictive, and more harmful than equivalent concentrations presented as percent nicotine. Participants seldom correctly identified that one concentration was stronger or that both were equivalent (7.58 [5.88] of 19 pairings), although they more often correctly identified the stronger concentration when it was presented in mg/mL (4.02 [SD = 3.01]) than in percent nicotine (2.53 [2.73], p < .001). The most consistent predictor of correct answers on these tasks was familiarity with using both products labeled as mg/mL and labeled as percent nicotine. Conclusions: Young e-cigarette users had difficulty understanding nicotine concentrations labeled using the most common metrics, raising concerns about inadvertent exposure to high nicotine levels and suggesting that a more intuitive labeling approach is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1397
页数:9
相关论文