Weed Interference in the Development of the Cassava Plant

被引:7
|
作者
Albuquerque, J. A. A. [1 ]
Sediyama, T. [2 ]
Silva, A. A. [2 ]
Alves, J. M. A. [1 ]
Finoto, E. L. [3 ]
Neto, F. A. [4 ,5 ]
Silva, G. R.
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rural Roraima UFRR, Dep Fitotecnia, Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Vicosa DFT UFV, Dep Fitotecnia, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[3] Agencia Paulista Tecnol Agronegocios APTA PRDTA C, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Piaui UFPI, Curso Agron, Bom Jesus, PI, Brazil
[5] DFT UFV, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
关键词
weed control; cassava; Manihot esculenta;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582012000100005
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
One of the factors affecting the development of the cassava plant is the inadequate control of weeds. Thus, this work aimed to evaluate the development of the cassava plant under weed interference during different coexistence periods. Two experiments were installed in adjacent areas, in Vicosa, Minas Gerais - Brazil. In the first experiment, the treatments consisted of different periods of coexistence between the cassava culture and the weeds (25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 days after planting). In the second experiment, the cassava plants remained weed-free for the same pre-established periods. For both experiments, the 1.0 x 0.5 m spacing was adopted, being the useful portion area constituted by the two central lines, with 1.0 m being left at each extremity as front borders, adding 8.0 m(2) up. Plant height and stem diameter were evaluated twelve times after planting at: 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250, 275, 300, 325 and 350 days. Plant number, root length and diameter evaluations were carried out 12 months after planting. Coexistence equal or superior to 50 day interval after planting caused drastic reduction in the stem diameter and height of the cassava plants. Weed control in cassava crop should be initiated around 25 days after planting.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 45
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Weed interference in cassava (Manihot esculenta) yield
    Albuquerque, J. A. A.
    Sediyama, T.
    Silva, A. A.
    Carneiro, J. E. S.
    Cecon, P. R.
    Alves, J. M. A.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2008, 26 (02) : 279 - 289
  • [2] WEED INTERFERENCE PERIODS IN THE 'FECULA BRANCA' CASSAVA
    Costa, N., V
    Ritter, L.
    Peres, E. J. L.
    Silva, P., V
    Vasconcelos, E. S.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2013, 31 (03) : 533 - 542
  • [3] Period of Weed Interference in Cassava (Manihot esculenta) in Northwestern Parana
    Biffe, D. F.
    Constantin, J.
    Oliveira Jr, R. S.
    Franchini, L. H. M.
    Rios, F. A.
    Blainski, E.
    Arantes, J. G. Z.
    Alonso, D. G.
    Cavalieri, S. D.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2010, 28 (03) : 471 - 478
  • [4] Weed Management in Cassava
    Silva, D. V.
    Santos, J. B.
    Ferreira, E. A.
    Silva, A. A.
    Franca, A. C.
    Sediyama, T.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2012, 30 (04) : 901 - 910
  • [5] Weed interference on nutrient accumulation in the leaves or cassava under no-tillage or conventional tillage
    Pompermaier Ramella, Joao Ricardo
    Barbosa, Jaqueline de Araujo
    Ferreira, Silvio Douglas
    Fey, Emerson
    da Costa, Neumarcio Vilanova
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2020, 55
  • [6] Understanding the role of allelopathy in weed interference and declining plant diversity
    Foy, CL
    Inderjit
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 15 (04) : 873 - 878
  • [7] INITIALISM AS A MECHANISM OF WEED INTERFERENCE: CAN A CROP PLANT BE BLINDED?
    Vidal, R. A.
    Trezzi, M. M.
    Kozlowski, L. A.
    Prates, M. V. B.
    Cieslik, L. F.
    Merotto Jr, A.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2012, 30 (03) : 469 - 475
  • [8] Plant Arrangement and Soybean Cultivar Roles in Weed Interference Results
    Bianchi, M. A.
    Fleck, N. G.
    Lamego, F. P.
    Agostinetto, D.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2010, 28 : 979 - 991
  • [9] EFFECT OF PLANT-POPULATION ON YIELD AND WEED INFESTATION OF CASSAVA-MAIZE INTERCROPPING
    OSSOM, EM
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1986, 56 (10): : 732 - 734
  • [10] Weed interference, pulse species, and plant density effects on rotational benefits
    Strydhorst, Sheri M.
    King, Jane R.
    Lopetinsky, Ken J.
    Harker, K. Neil
    WEED SCIENCE, 2008, 56 (02) : 249 - 258