The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

被引:6
|
作者
Sobczuk, Pawel [1 ,2 ]
Kozak, Katarzyna [1 ]
Kopec, Sylwia [1 ]
Rogala, Pawel [1 ]
Switaj, Tomasz [1 ]
Kosela-Paterczyk, Hanna [1 ]
Gos, Aleksandra [3 ]
Tysarowski, Andrzej [3 ,4 ]
Rutkowski, Piotr [1 ]
机构
[1] Maria Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol, Bone Sarcoma & Melanoma, Dept Soft Tissue, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Lab Ctr Preclin Res, Dept Expt & Clin Physiol, PL-02097 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Maria Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol, Dept Mol & Translat Oncol, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[4] Maria Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst, Canc Mol & Genet Diagnost Dept, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
melanoma; liquid biopsy; ctDNA; BRAF; MEK inhibitors; CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA; METASTATIC MELANOMA; DABRAFENIB; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; VEMURAFENIB; TRAMETINIB; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/cancers14030777
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, previously untreated melanoma patients since it is present in 40-50% of cases and allows treatment with specific inhibitors. The testing is usually performed on the primary tumor or metastatic lesion; however, in some cases, liquid biopsy and analysis of circulating tumor DNA in the blood can be used. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation. We identified 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) who underwent such a procedure. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% of liquid biopsies and 44.8% of tissue samples. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in liquid biopsy. Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, treatment-naive melanoma patients. Liquid biopsy can be an alternative in cases with inadequate or unavailable tumor tissue. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation testing and to assess outcomes of therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors initiated based on the liquid biopsy results. This was a retrospective single-center analysis of 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) with advanced melanoma who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) BRAF mutation testing. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% (21/46) of liquid biopsies and 44.8% (13/29) of tissue samples. In patients with both ctDNA and tissue samples (n = 29), the concordance between the results of both tests was 82.8%. A BRAF mutation was detected in 7/17 (41.2%) patients with only ctDNA analysis. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. The objective response rate was 77.8 %, and the median PFS was 6.0 months. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in plasma ctDNA. This study provides initial real-world data showing that treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be commenced based on liquid biopsy results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BRAF mutation testing in clinical practice
    Ziai, James
    Hui, Pei
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2012, 12 (02) : 127 - 138
  • [2] Use of ctDNA in identifying an actionable BRAF mutation in stage 4 metastatic melanoma
    Bennett, Charlotte
    Morgan, Sian
    Aboud, Karam
    Frazer, Ricky Dylan
    BMJ CASE REPORTS, 2023, 16 (06)
  • [3] Epidemiological study to evaluate the prevalence of BRAF V600 mutation in patients (pts) diagnosed with advanced melanoma (AM) in routine clinical practice in Spain.
    Arance Fernandez, Ana Maria
    Alos Hernandez, Lucia
    Cerezuela Fuentes, Pablo
    Ortiz Reina, Sebastian
    Ortega Izquierdo, Eugenia
    Marti Laborda, Rosa Ma
    Soberino, Jesus
    Ferrer Fabrega, Berta
    Rubio, Jordi
    Perez Bueno, Fernando
    Teresa Perez-Hoyos, Maria
    Cancho Galan, Goikoane
    Ballesteros Garcia, Ana Isabel
    Fraga Fernandez, Javier
    Marquez Rodas, Ivan
    Parra, Veronica
    Montagut Viladot, Clara
    Bellosillo, Beatriz
    Luis Rodriguez-Peralto, Jose
    Lopez-Martin, Jose A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [4] Rare BRAF mutations in melanoma patients: implications for molecular testing in clinical practice
    Heinzerling, L.
    Kuehnapfel, S.
    Meckbach, D.
    Baiter, M.
    Kaempgen, E.
    Keikavoussi, P.
    Schuler, G.
    Agaimy, A.
    Bauer, J.
    Hartmann, A.
    Kiesewetter, F.
    Schneider-Stock, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (10) : 2164 - 2171
  • [5] Rare BRAF mutations in melanoma patients: implications for molecular testing in clinical practice
    L Heinzerling
    S Kühnapfel
    D Meckbach
    M Baiter
    E Kaempgen
    P Keikavoussi
    G Schuler
    A Agaimy
    J Bauer
    A Hartmann
    F Kiesewetter
    R Schneider-Stock
    British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 108 : 2164 - 2171
  • [6] BRAF codon 600 mutation testing in malignant melanoma patients
    Eaton, Helen
    Wallace, A.
    Howard, E.
    Gaunt, L.
    Lorigan, P.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2012, 49 : S54 - S54
  • [7] Performance status of patients with advanced melanoma over time in routine clinical practice
    Sadetsky, Natalia
    Zhao, Zhongyun
    Barber, Beth
    Wagner, Volker Jean
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [8] PERFORMANCE STATUS OF PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED MELANOMA OVER TIME IN ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE
    Sadetsky, N.
    Zhao, Z.
    Barber, B.
    Wagner, V
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A226 - A226
  • [9] Treatment sequencing and survival outcomes in BRAF mutation-positive metastatic melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy in routine clinical practice in the United States
    Sadetsky, Natalia
    Chuo, Ching-Yi
    McKenna, Edward
    Troutman, Sarah
    Colburn, Dawn
    Atkins, Michael B.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 17
  • [10] Clinical Characterization of Melanoma patients with and without activating BRAF Mutation
    Schlaak, M.
    Bajah, A.
    von Bartenwerffer, W.
    Kreuzberg, N.
    Buettner, N.
    Mauch, C.
    Kurschat, P.
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2011, 9 (11): : 976 - 976