Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure

被引：0
|
作者：
Huirne, J. A. F. [1 ,2 ]
Stegwee, S. I. [1 ,2 ]
van der Voet, L. F. [3 ]
de Groot, C. J. M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Hehenkamp, W. J. K. [1 ,2 ]
Brolmann, H. A. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Res Inst Cardiovasc Res ICaR VU, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Deventer Ziekenhuis, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nico Bolkesteinlaan 75, Deventer, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Res Inst Amsterdam Reprod & Dev, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源：
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY | 2017年 / 50卷 / 05期
关键词：
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SECTION; INCISION; DELIVERY; SEGMENT; RUPTURE; IMPACT;
D O I：
10.1002/uog.18901
中图分类号：
O42 [声学];
学科分类号：
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：664 / +
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure Reply
    Saccone, G.
    Sardo, A. Di Spiezio
    Berghella, V.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 666 - +
  • [2] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Rozenberg, P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05)
  • [3] Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sardo, A. Di Spiezio
    Saccone, G.
    Mccurdy, R.
    Bujold, E.
    Bifulco, G.
    Berghella, V.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 578 - 583
  • [4] Single- or double-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean: A randomized trial
    Yilmaz Baran, Safak
    Kalayci, Hakan
    Dogan Durdag, Gulsen
    Yetkinel, Selcuk
    Alemdaroglu, Songul
    cok, Tayfun
    Bulgan Kilicdag, Esra
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (03) : 531 - 537
  • [5] Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Demers, Suzanne
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Chaillet, Nils
    Moore, Lynne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (05) : 453 - 460
  • [6] Single- vs. double-layer uterine incision closure at primary cesarean section and adhesion formation
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    Caughey, Aaron
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    Daniels, Kay
    Lyell, Deirdre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S77 - S77
  • [7] Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Chaillet, Nils
    Boutin, Amelie
    Moore, Lynne
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Brassard, Normand
    Gauthier, Robert J.
    Hudic, Igor
    Shipp, Thomas D.
    Weimar, Charlotte H. E.
    Fatusic, Zlatan
    Demers, Suzanne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 115 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [8] Impact of single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Vidaeff, AC
    Lucas, MJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (02) : 602 - 603
  • [9] The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Cruikshank, DP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 295 - 296
  • [10] The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Joura, EA
    Nather, A
    Hohlagschwandtner, M
    Husslein, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (03) : 895 - 895
12345