High versus Standard Intensity of Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Kollias, Anastasios [1 ]
Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos G. [1 ]
Trontzas, Ioannis P. [1 ]
Rapti, Vassiliki [1 ]
Kyriakoulis, Ioannis G. [1 ]
Theochari, Christina A. [1 ]
Dimakakos, Evangelos [1 ]
Poulakou, Garyphallia [1 ]
Syrigos, Konstantinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sotiria Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Med 3, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
anticoagulation; COVID-19; therapeutics; dose; meta-analysis; mortality; thromboprophylaxis; treatment; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; PROPHYLACTIC ANTICOAGULATION; THERAPEUTIC ANTICOAGULATION; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10235549
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 has been associated with a survival benefit and is strongly recommended. However, the optimal dose of thromboprophylaxis remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis (PubMed/EMBASE) of studies comparing high (intermediate or therapeutic dose) versus standard (prophylactic dose) intensity of thrombo-prophylaxis with regard to outcome of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was performed. Randomized and non-randomized studies that provided adjusted effect size estimates were included. Meta-analysis of 7 studies comparing intermediate versus prophylactic dose of thromboprophylaxis (2 randomized and 5 observational, n = 2009, weighted age 61 years, males 61%, ICU 53%) revealed a pooled adjusted relative risk (RR) for death at 0.56 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.34, 0.92) in favor of the intermediate dose. For the same comparison arms, the pooled RR for venous thromboembolism was 0.84 (95% CI 0.54, 1.31), and for major bleeding events was 1.63 (95% CI 0.79, 3.37). Meta-analysis of 17 studies comparing therapeutic versus prophylactic dose of thromboprophylaxis (2 randomized and 15 observational, n = 7776, weighted age 64 years, males 54%, ICU 21%) revealed a pooled adjusted RR for death at 0.73 (95% CI 0.47, 1.14) for the therapeutic dose. An opposite trend was observed in the unadjusted analysis of 15 observational studies (RR 1.24 (95% CI 0.88, 1.74)). For the same comparison arms, the pooled RR for venous thromboembolism was 1.13 (95% CI 0.52, 2.48), and for major bleeding events 3.32 (95% CI 2.51, 4.40). In conclusion, intermediate compared with standard prophylactic dose of thromboprophylaxis appears to be rather safe and is associated with additional survival benefit, although most data are derived from observational retrospective analyses. Randomized studies are needed to define the optimal thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-dose versus low-dose venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Emanuele Valeriani
    Angelo Porfidia
    Walter Ageno
    Silvia Spoto
    Roberto Pola
    Marcello Di Nisio
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2022, 17 : 1817 - 1825
  • [2] High-dose versus low-dose venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Valeriani, Emanuele
    Porfidia, Angelo
    Ageno, Walter
    Spoto, Silvia
    Pola, Roberto
    Di Nisio, Marcello
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (06) : 1817 - 1825
  • [3] Venous Thromboembolism among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Undergoing Thromboprophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chi, Gerald
    Lee, Jane J.
    Jamil, Adeel
    Gunnam, Vamsikrishna
    Najafi, Homa
    Montazerin, Sahar Memar
    Shojaei, Fahimehalsadat
    Marszalek, Jolanta
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 17
  • [4] Thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 Outpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    See, X.
    Ahmed, O.
    Chiang, C.
    Liu, W.
    Chang, Y.
    Peng, C.
    Wang, Z.
    Chiang, C.
    Hsia, Y.
    Chiang, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [5] Thromboprophylaxis for outpatients with COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chiang, Cho-Han
    Ahmed, Omer
    Liu, Weitao
    See, Xin Ya
    Chang, Yu-Cheng
    Peng, Chun-Yu
    Wang, Zihan
    Chiang, Cho-Hsien
    Hsia, Yuan Ping
    Chiang, Cho-Hung
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2024, 57 (05) : 784 - 787
  • [6] Predictors of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tian, Wenjie
    Jiang, Wanlin
    Yao, Jie
    Nicholson, Christopher J.
    Li, Rebecca H.
    Sigurslid, Haakon H.
    Wooster, Luke
    Rotter, Jerome I.
    Guo, Xiuqing
    Malhotra, Rajeev
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 92 (10) : 1875 - 1883
  • [7] COVID-19 fatality rates in hospitalized patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Macedo, Ana
    Goncalves, Nilza
    Febra, Claudia
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 57 : 14 - 21
  • [8] Bloodstream Infections in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ippolito, Mariachiara
    Simone, Barbara
    Filisina, Carlotta
    Catalanotto, Francesca Romana
    Catalisano, Giulia
    Marino, Claudia
    Misseri, Giovanni
    Giarratano, Antonino
    Cortegiani, Andrea
    MICROORGANISMS, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [9] Risk of Malnutrition in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Feng, Xiaoru
    Liu, Zeqi
    He, Xiaotong
    Wang, Xibiao
    Yuan, Changzheng
    Huang, Liyan
    Song, Rui
    Wu, You
    NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [10] Effect of famotidine on hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chiu, Leonard
    Shen, Max
    Lo, Chun-Han
    Chiu, Nicholas
    Chen, Austin
    Shin, Hyun Joon
    Prsic, Elizabeth Horn
    Hur, Chin
    Chow, Ronald
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):