Sensitivity of multiple first trimester sonomarkers in fetal aneuploidy detection

被引:10
|
作者
Chanprapaph, Pharuhas [1 ]
Dulyakasem, Chitnapin [1 ]
Phattanchindakun, Buraya [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol,Fetal Med Unit, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
关键词
Absent/reversed ductus venosus; aneuploidy; first trimester-screening; nasal bone; nuchal translucency; sensitivity; sonomarkers; tricuspid regurgitation; A SERUM DISTRIBUTIONS; FREE BETA-HCG; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY; PAPP-A; TRICUSPID REGURGITATION; DICHORIONIC TWINS; NASAL BONE; 1ST-TRIMESTER; TRISOMY-21; PREGNANCIES;
D O I
10.1515/jpm-2014-0201
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Multiple first trimester aneuploidy sonomarkers have been introduced recently. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of first trimester sonomarkers in fetal aneuploidy detection without serum markers. Methods: There were entirely 280 fetuses with 11-13+6 weeks' gestation (crown-rump -length between 45-84 mm) enrolled to assess nuchal translucency thickness (NT), nasal bone (NB), tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and ductus venosus (DV) flow. The performance of each single marker and multiple markers for major fetal aneuploidy screening were determined. Results: Totally, 190 fetuses (67.85%) underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis with 14 major chromosome abnormalities identified including 4 cases of trisomy 21, 4 cases of trisomy 18, 3 cases of trisomy 13 and 3 cases of 45, XO. NT was the most accurate single marker with sensitivity of 71.43% and false-positive rate (FPR) of 4.14% while NB or TR was the most specific marker (99.6%) but lacked sensitivity. Among multiple first trimester-screening sono-markers, NT plus TR evaluation were the most sensitive test (78.57%) with FPR of 4.76%. Conclusion: NT was the most accurate first trimester-screening marker for fetal aneuploidy. NT plus TR assessment as double-screening markers could improve the sensitivity by 7% leading to the lower number of unnecessary invasive prenatal diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 365
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Promises and pitfalls of first trimester sonographic markers in the detection of fetal aneuploidy
    Borrell, Antoni
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (01) : 62 - 68
  • [2] Sonographic screening for fetal aneuploidy - First trimester
    Souter, VL
    Nyberg, DA
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (07) : 775 - 790
  • [3] First Trimester Ultrasound Assessment for Fetal Aneuploidy
    Hyett, Jon
    Mogra, Ritu
    Sonek, Jiri
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 57 (01): : 142 - 158
  • [4] ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF ANEUPLOIDY IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER
    CULLEN, MT
    GREEN, JJ
    SCIOSCIA, AL
    GABRIELLI, S
    SANCHEZRAMOS, L
    HOBBINS, JC
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (08) : 559 - 563
  • [5] Detection of Fetal Structural Anomalies in a Basic First-Trimester Screening Program for Aneuploidy
    Bromley, Bryann
    Shipp, Thomas D.
    Lyons, Jennifer
    Navathe, Reshama S.
    Groszmann, Yvette
    Benacerraf, Beryl R.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (10) : 1737 - 1745
  • [6] Application of ductus venosus Doppler velocimetry for the detection of fetal aneuploidy in the first trimester of pregnancy
    Murta, CGV
    Moron, AF
    Avila, MAP
    Weiner, CP
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2002, 17 (05) : 308 - 314
  • [7] The acceptability of sequential first and second trimester screening for fetal aneuploidy
    Benn, Peter
    Campbell, Winston
    Zelop, Carolyn
    Egan, James
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (06) : S194 - S194
  • [8] Ethical Dimensions of First-trimester Fetal Aneuploidy Screening
    Chervenak, Frank A.
    McCullough, Laurence B.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 57 (01): : 226 - 231
  • [9] First-trimester nuchal translucency screening for fetal aneuploidy
    Sherer, DM
    Manning, FA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1999, 16 (03) : 103 - 120
  • [10] First-trimester growth restriction and fetal aneuploidy: The effect of type of aneuploidy and gestational age
    BahadoSingh, RO
    Lynch, L
    Deren, O
    Morroti, R
    Copel, JA
    Mahoney, MJ
    Williams, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (05) : 976 - 980