Council of the European Union;
negotiations;
networks;
POLICY NETWORKS;
2004;
ENLARGEMENT;
SOCIAL NETWORKS;
EXCHANGE;
MODELS;
CHOICE;
INSTITUTIONS;
COOPERATION;
INFORMATION;
EMERGENCE;
D O I:
10.1177/1465116517740228
中图分类号:
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号:
0302 ;
030201 ;
摘要:
We test two of the main explanations of the formation of political ties. The first states that political actors are more likely to form a relationship if they have similar policy preferences. The second explanation, from network theory, predicts that the likelihood of a tie between two actors depends on the presence of certain relationships with other actors. Our data consist of a unique combination of actors' policy positions and their network relations over time in the Council of the European Union. We find evidence that both types of explanations matter, although there seems to be variation in the extent to which preference similarity affects network evolution. We consider the implications of these findings for understanding the decision-making in the Council.
机构:
London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, EnglandLondon Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
Hagemann, Sara
Hobolt, Sara B.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, European Inst, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, EnglandLondon Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
Hobolt, Sara B.
Wratil, Christopher
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, EnglandLondon Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England