The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students

被引:68
|
作者
Liew, Siaw-Cheok [1 ,2 ]
Sidhu, Jagmohni [1 ,2 ]
Barua, Ankur [3 ]
机构
[1] Int Med Univ, Dept Clin Skills, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
[2] Int Med Univ, Simulat Ctr, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
[3] Int Med Univ, Dept Community Med, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
来源
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Learning; Styles; Approach; Assist; Vark; Medical; Students; PERFORMANCE; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-015-0327-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Learning styles and approaches of individual undergraduate medical students vary considerably and as a consequence, their learning needs also differ from one student to another. This study was conducted to identify different learning styles and approaches of pre-clinical, undergraduate medical students and also to determine the relationships of learning preferences with performances in the summative examinations. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among randomly selected 419 pre-clinical, undergraduate medical students of the International Medical University (IMU) in Kuala Lumpur. The number of students from Year 2 was 217 while that from Year 3 was 202. The Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, Kinesthetic (VARK) and the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) questionnaires were used for data collection. Results: This study revealed that 343 students (81.9%) had unimodal learning style, while the remaining 76 (18.1%) used a multimodal learning style. Among the unimodal learners, a majority (30.1%) were of Kinesthetic (K) type. Among the middle and high achievers in summative examinations, a majority had unimodal (Kinaesthetic) learning style (30.5%) and were also strategic/deep learners (79.4%). However, the learning styles and approaches did not contribute significantly towards the learning outcomes in summative examinations. Conclusions: A majority of the students in this study had Unimodal (Kinesthetic) learning style. The learning preferences (styles and approaches) did not contribute significantly to the learning outcomes. Future work to re-assess the viability of these learning preferences (styles and approaches) after the incorporation of teaching-learning instructions tailored specifically to the students will be beneficial to help medical teachers in facilitating students to become more capable learners.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students
    Siaw-Cheok Liew
    Jagmohni Sidhu
    Ankur Barua
    BMC Medical Education, 15
  • [2] Learning Style Preferences among Pre-clinical Medical Students in a Public University in Pahang
    Jamani, Nurjasmine Aida
    AbdAziz, Karimah Hanim
    Ab Karim, Hanis Syazana Che
    Nizar, Fatma Azzahraa
    Dzulkarnain, Husna Najihah
    Azimi, Muhammad Irham
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL MALAYSIA, 2018, 17 : 11 - 15
  • [3] Learning Styles of Undergraduate Medical Students
    Cortes Barre, Michelle
    Guillen Olaya, Javier Fabricio
    UNIVERSITAS MEDICA, 2018, 59 (02):
  • [4] Research by pre-clinical undergraduate medical students
    Joubert, G
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 40 (05) : 470 - 471
  • [5] LEARNING STYLES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES IN MEDICAL STUDENTS
    HOROWITZ, MJ
    SCHOOL REVIEW, 1966, 74 (01): : 48 - 65
  • [6] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER AND LEARNING STYLE PREFERENCES- A STUDY AMONG UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS IN SOUTH INDIA
    Raj, Satya
    Kanagasabapathy, Shankar
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2019, 8 (19): : 1550 - 1554
  • [7] Learning Styles of Postgraduate and Undergraduate Medical Students
    Shukr, Irian
    Zainab, Roop
    Rana, Mowadat H.
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2013, 23 (01): : 25 - 30
  • [8] Learning styles and academic achievement among undergraduate medical students in Thailand
    Jiraporncharoen, Wichuda
    Angkurawaranon, Chaisiri
    Chockjamsai, Manoch
    Deesomchok, Athavudh
    Euathrongchit, Juntima
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2015, 12
  • [9] The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes
    David Gijbels
    Gerard Van de Watering
    Filip Dochy
    Piet Van den Bossche
    European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2005, 20 : 327 - 341
  • [10] The relationship between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes
    Gijbels, D
    Van de Watering, G
    Dochy, F
    Van den Bossche, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2005, 20 (04) : 327 - 341