Allocating remedial costs at superfund sites with commingled groundwater contaminant plumes

被引:12
|
作者
Marryott, RA [1 ]
Sabadell, GP
Ahlfeld, DP
Harris, RH
Pinder, GF
机构
[1] ENVIRON Int Corp, Carnegie Ctr 214, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Blasland Bouck & Lee Inc, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Dept Math, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/enfo.1999.0006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Remedial efforts at Superfund sites across the country focus on groundwater contaminant plumes that have been produced by contributions from multiple parties. Allocating cleanup costs between the parties in a fair and equitable manner can be a problem of substantial complexity. Considerable time and money may be spent determining the amount of contamination attributable to each party in order to apportion liability. Contaminant plumes that have evolved over long periods of time may affect large volumes of groundwater and require extensive remediation. Pump and treat remedial costs are driven by both the volume of water extracted and the mass of contaminants removed. Allocation methods based solely on the mass of contaminants contributed by each party are inadequate in this setting since they do not account for both components of the remedial costs. This paper presents an approach for equitably allocating remedial costs when addressing overlapping or commingled groundwater plumes. The method accounts for the major elements driving the costs of remediating dispersed contaminant plumes. (C) 2000 AEHS.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 54
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BUOYANT CONTAMINANT PLUMES IN GROUNDWATER
    PASCHKE, NW
    HOOPES, JA
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1984, 20 (09) : 1183 - 1192
  • [2] ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES AT A SUPERFUND SITE
    ZHENG, C
    BENNETT, GD
    ANDREWS, CB
    GROUND WATER, 1991, 29 (06) : 838 - 848
  • [3] Allocating remedial costs at a superfund site using risk magnitude, geographic information systems, and Monte Carlo analysis
    McGuire, Travis M.
    Newell, Charles J.
    Osorio, Ximena
    Walker, Kenneth L.
    Keat, Andrew J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSICS, 2020, 21 (02) : 223 - 235
  • [4] ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES AT A SUPERFUND SITE - DISCUSSION
    MCCALEB, RD
    GROUND WATER, 1992, 30 (03) : 440 - 440
  • [5] ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES AT A SUPERFUND SITE - REPLY
    ZHENG, C
    BENNETT, GD
    ANDREWS, CB
    GROUND WATER, 1992, 30 (03) : 440 - 442
  • [6] Characterization of redox conditions in groundwater contaminant plumes
    Christensen, TH
    Bjerg, PL
    Banwart, SA
    Jakobsen, R
    Heron, G
    Albrechtsen, HJ
    JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2000, 45 (3-4) : 165 - 241
  • [7] PERSONNEL PROTECTION THROUGH RECONNAISSANCE ROBOTICS AT SUPERFUND REMEDIAL SITES
    FRANK, U
    ESPOSITO, C
    SULLIVAN, D
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1992, 42 (03): : 341 - 345
  • [8] Allocating - Cleanup costs at waste sites
    Ram, NM
    Wiest, MA
    Davis, CP
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (06) : 128A - 135A
  • [9] Sampling network design for delineating groundwater contaminant plumes
    McGrath, WA
    Pinder, GF
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN WATER RESOURCES XI, VOL 1: COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SUBSURFACE FLOW AND TRANSPORT PROBLEMS, 1996, : 185 - 192
  • [10] The importance of transects for characterizing aged organic contaminant plumes in groundwater
    Steelman, Colby M.
    Meyer, Jessica R.
    Wanner, Philipp
    Swanson, Benjamin J.
    Conway-White, Oliver
    Parker, Beth L.
    JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2020, 235