Estimating the uncertainty of modeled carbon sequestration: The GreenCert™ system

被引:9
|
作者
Updegraff, Karen [1 ]
Zimmerman, Patrick R. [2 ]
Kozak, Patrick [1 ]
Chen, Ding-Geng [3 ]
Price, Maribeth [4 ]
机构
[1] Evergreen Energy Inc, Rapid City, SD 57701 USA
[2] C Lock Inc, Rapid City, SD 57701 USA
[3] Georgia So Univ, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[4] S Dakota Sch Mines & Technol, Dept Geol, Rapid City, SD 57701 USA
关键词
GreenCert (TM); C-LOCK (R); Soil carbon; Carbon sequestration; CENTURY; Monte Carlo; Sensitivity; SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; DYNAMICS; SIMULATION; MANAGEMENT; PLAINS; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.05.009
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The GreenCert (TM) system was developed to help farm and ranch owners to quantify, standardize, pool and market CO2 emissions offset (sequestration) credits derived from improved rangeland or cropland management. It combines a user-friendly interface with the CENTURY biogeochemical model, a GIS database of soil and climate parameters, and a Monte Carlo-based uncertainty estimation methodology. This paper focuses on uncertainty treatment, discussing sources of error, parameter distributions, and the Monte Carlo randomization approach, culminating in a sensitivity analysis of model parameters. Idealized crop and grazing scenarios were used to evaluate the uncertainty of modeled soil organic carbon stocks and stock changes stemming from variability in site and management parameters. Normalized sensitivity coefficients and an integrated index for relative sensitivity of the model to the ensemble of the tested variables indicate that environmental factors are the most important in determining the actual size of the soil carbon stock, but that management is a much more important determinant of short- to medium-term carbon fluxes. GreenCert (TM), uses the patented C-LOCK (R) approach to efficiently limit uncertainty in the most critical phase of the modelling process by maximizing the use of available management information, and quantifies the remaining uncertainty in an unbiased fashion using Monte Carlo parameter randomization. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1565 / 1572
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeled carbon sequestration variation in a linked erosion-deposition system
    Jenerette, G. Darrel
    Lal, Rattan
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 200 (1-2) : 207 - 216
  • [2] An empirically based approach for estimating uncertainty associated with modelling carbon sequestration in soils
    Ogle, Stephen M.
    Breidt, F. Jay
    Easter, Mark
    Williams, Steve
    Paustian, Keith
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 205 (3-4) : 453 - 463
  • [3] Carbon sequestration through afforestation under uncertainty
    Lewandrowski, Jan
    Kim, C. S.
    Aillery, Marcel
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 38 : 90 - 96
  • [4] Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils: Discounting for uncertainty
    Kurkalova, LA
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2005, 53 (04): : 375 - 384
  • [5] Carbon sequestration and land management under uncertainty
    Krcmar, E
    Stennes, B
    van Kooten, GC
    Vertinsky, I
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 135 (03) : 616 - 629
  • [6] Estimating leakage from forest carbon sequestration programs
    Murray, BC
    McCarl, BA
    Lee, HC
    LAND ECONOMICS, 2004, 80 (01) : 109 - 124
  • [7] Estimating carbon sequestration potential on US agricultural topsoils
    Sperow, Mark
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2016, 155 : 390 - 400
  • [8] Comparison of approaches for estimating carbon sequestration at the regional scale
    Falloon, P
    Smith, P
    Szabó, J
    Pásztor, L
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 18 (03) : 164 - 174
  • [9] Carbon sequestration and conservation of tropical forests under uncertainty
    Reddy, SRC
    Price, C
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 50 (01) : 17 - 35
  • [10] Conceptual issues related to carbon sequestration: Uncertainty and time
    van Kooten, GC
    Grainger, A
    Ley, E
    Marland, G
    Solberg, B
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 27 : S65 - S82