Buffering volatility: Storage investments and technology-specific renewable energy support

被引:28
|
作者
Abrell, Jan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rausch, Sebastian [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Streitberger, Clemens [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Management Technol & Econ, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, CEPE, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Zurich Univ Appl Sci Winterthur, Ctr Energy & Environm, Winterthur, Switzerland
[4] ETH, ETH Zurich, CER, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Renewable energy; Electricity; Volatility; Intermittency; Storage; Technology-specific regulation; Subsidies; Energy policy; Climate policy; ECONOMICS; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2019.07.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Mitigating climate change will require integrating large amounts of highly intermittent renewable energy (RE) sources in future electricity markets. Considerable uncertainties exist about the cost and availability of future large-scale storage to alleviate the potential mismatch between demand and supply. This paper examines the suitability of regulatory (public policy) mechanisms for coping with the volatility induced by intermittent RE sources, using a numerical equilibrium model of a future wholesale electricity market. We find that the optimal RE subsidies are technology-specific reflecting the heterogeneous value for system integration. Differentiated RE subsidies reduce the curtailment of excess production, thereby preventing costly investments in energy storage. Using a simple cost-benefit framework, we show that a smart design of RE support policies significantly reduces the level of optimal storage. We further find that the marginal benefits of storage rapidly decrease for short-term (intra-day) storage and are small for long-term (seasonal) storage independent of the storage level. This suggests that storage is not likely to be the limiting factor for decarbonizing the electricity sector. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can Technology-Specific Deployment Policies Be Cost-Effective? The Case of Renewable Energy Support Schemes
    Lehmann, Paul
    Soderholm, Patrik
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2018, 71 (02): : 475 - 505
  • [2] Can Technology-Specific Deployment Policies Be Cost-Effective? The Case of Renewable Energy Support Schemes
    Paul Lehmann
    Patrik Söderholm
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2018, 71 : 475 - 505
  • [3] Market Evaluation of Energy Storage Systems Incorporating Technology-Specific Nonlinear Models
    Nguyen, Tu A.
    Copp, David A.
    Byrne, Raymond H.
    Chalamala, Babu R.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (05) : 3706 - 3715
  • [4] Preventing early lock-in with technology-specific policy designs: The Renewable Portfolio Standards and diversity in renewable energy technologies
    Kim, Jung Eun
    Tang, Tian
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 123
  • [5] Rationales for technology-specific RES support and their relevance for German policy
    Gawel, Erik
    Lehmann, Paul
    Purkus, Alexandra
    Soederhohn, Patrik
    Witte, Katherina
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 102 : 16 - 26
  • [6] Renewable Energy Investments, Support Schemes and the Dirty Option
    De Giovanni, Domenico
    Iakimova, Elena
    APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, 2024,
  • [7] A multi criteria decision support framework for renewable energy storage technology selection
    Liu, Yong
    Du, Jun-liang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 277
  • [8] Renewable energy investments with storage: a risk-return analysis
    Kroemer, Sarah
    Gatzert, Nadine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2018, 12 (04) : 714 - 736
  • [9] Research of Application of Energy Storage Technology on Renewable Energy
    Zhang Xiaotian
    Li Wei
    Pan Xiao
    Zhang Mingli
    Deng Xinyang
    2018 CHINA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION (CICED), 2018, : 716 - 720
  • [10] Power storage technology for renewable energy in Kyushu
    2020, Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (140): : 213 - 216