Improved pain control after cardiac surgery: Results of a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial

被引:101
|
作者
Dowling, R
Thielmeier, K
Ghaly, A
Barber, D
Boice, T
Dine, A
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Jewish Hosp, Heart & Lung Inst, Louisville, KY USA
[3] Med Ctr Anesthesiologists, Louisville, KY USA
[4] I Flow Corp, Lake Forest, CA USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5223(03)00585-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We sought to determine whether a continuous regional infusion of a local anesthetic delivered to the operative site would result in decreased levels of postoperative pain and narcotic requirements for patients who undergo a standard median sternotomy for cardiac surgery. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at a single center. Patients who were undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery alone or combined with laser transmyocardial revascularization received bilateral intercostal nerve blocks with either ropivacaine or saline. At wound closure, 2 catheters with multiple side openings were inserted percutaneously and placed directly over the sternum. The same agent (ropivacaine vs saline) was then administered as a continuous regional infusion for 48 hours through an elastomeric pump. Requirements for postoperative systemic narcotic analgesics and pain assessment scores were recorded for 72 hours after the operation. Secondary outcome measures were hospital length of stay and pulmonary function test results. Pain scores and narcotic use on the second postoperative day were also compared to avoid the confounding influence of anesthesia administered at the time of the operation. Results: The total amount of narcotic analgesia required by the ropivacaine group was significantly less than that of the control group (47.3 vs 78.7 mg, respectively; P = .038). The ropivacaine group required less narcotics on postoperative day 2 as well (15.5 vs 29.4 mg, P = .025). The mean overall pain scores for the ropivacaine group were significantly less than the mean overall scores for the normal saline group (1.6 vs 2.6, respectively; P = .005). Patients receiving ropivacaine had a mean length of stay of 5.2 days compared with 8.2 days for patients in the normal saline group (P = .001). Excluding the data from outliers (length of stay = 39 days), the normal saline group mean length of stay was 6.3 days (P < .01). There was no difference in assessment of pulmonary function. Conclusion: Continuous delivery of local anesthetics significantly improved postoperative pain control while decreasing the amount of narcotic analgesia required in patients who underwent standard median sternotomy. There was also a significant decrease in hospital length of stay, which is likely to result in significant cost reductions.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1278
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Levosimendan in Congenital Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Momeni, Mona
    Rubay, Jean
    Matta, Amine
    Rennotte, Marie-Therese
    Veyckemans, Francis
    Poncelet, Alain Jean
    de Clety, Stephan Clement
    Anslot, Christine
    Joomye, Ryad
    Detaille, Thierry
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2011, 25 (03) : 419 - 424
  • [2] Parasternal intercostal block with ropivacaine for pain management after cardiac surgery: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Barr, Althea M.
    Tutungi, Elli
    Almeida, Aubre A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2007, 21 (04) : 547 - 553
  • [3] Reduction of postoperative pain: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Browning, WD
    Johnson, WW
    Gregory, PN
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 128 (12): : 1661 - 1667
  • [4] The prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial in orthopaedic surgery
    Clark, CR
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (08): : 1119 - 1120
  • [5] Vasopressin Does Not Raise Cardiac Enzymes Following Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Okamoto, Yasuhisa
    Nohmi, Toshihiro
    Higa, Yuki
    Seki, Kouichiro
    Yamashita, Akihide
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [6] A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of 3 Regimens for Sedation and Analgesia After Cardiac Surgery
    Oliver, William C., Jr.
    Nuttall, Gregory A.
    Murari, Terri
    Bauer, Lori K.
    Johnsrud, Kelly H.
    Long, Kirsten J. Hall
    Orszulak, Thomas A.
    Schaff, Hartzell V.
    Hanson, Andrew C.
    Schroeder, Darrell R.
    Ereth, Mark H.
    Abel, Martin D.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2011, 25 (01) : 110 - 119
  • [7] RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF APROTININ IN COLONIC SURGERY
    YOUNG, HL
    WHEELER, MH
    CLARK, CG
    HAMPSON, LG
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1984, 8 (03) : 367 - 373
  • [8] Levetiracetam for partial seizures - Results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Cereghino, JJ
    Biton, V
    Abou-Khalil, B
    Dreifuss, F
    Gauer, LJ
    Leppik, I
    NEUROLOGY, 2000, 55 (02) : 236 - 242
  • [9] Pain control after dental surgery: A double-blind, randomised trial of lornoxicam versus morphine
    Norholt, SE
    SindetPedersen, S
    Larsen, U
    Bang, U
    Ingerslev, J
    Nielsen, O
    Hansen, HJ
    Ersboll, AK
    PAIN, 1996, 67 (2-3) : 335 - 343
  • [10] Preoperative Paravertebral Block and Chronic Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Double-blind Randomized Trial
    Albi-Feldzer, Aline
    Dureau, Sylvain
    Ghimouz, Abdelmalek
    Raft, Julien
    Soubirou, Jean-Luc
    Gayraud, Guillaume
    Jayr, Christian
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 135 (06) : 1091 - 1103