Personal needs versus national needs: public attitudes regarding health care priorities at the personal and national levels

被引:3
|
作者
Kaplan, Giora [1 ]
Baron-Epel, Orna [2 ]
机构
[1] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Gertner Inst Epidemiol & Hlth Policy Res, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Fac Social Welf & Hlth Studies, Sch Publ Hlth, IL-31999 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Health policy; Health priorities; National health insurance; Health insurance; National survey; Public opinion; BEHAVIOR; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1186/s13584-015-0010-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Many stakeholders have little or no confidence in the ability of the public to express their opinions on health policy issues. The claim often arises that lay people prioritize according to their own personal experiences and may lack the broad perspective necessary to understand the needs of the population at large. In order to test this claim empirically, this study compares the public's priorities regarding personal insurance to their priorities regarding allocation of national health resources. Thus, the study should shed light on the extent to which the public's priorities at the national level are a reflection of their priorities at the personal level. Methods: A telephone survey was conducted with a representative sample of the Israeli adult population aged 18 and over (n = 1,225). The public's priorities were assessed by asking interviewees to assume that they were the Minister of Health and from this point of view allocate an additional budget among various health areas. Their priorities at the personal level were assessed by asking interviewees to choose preferred items for inclusion in their personal supplementary health insurance. Results: Over half of the respondents (54%) expressed different personal and national priorities. In multivariable logistic analysis, "population group" was the only variable found to be statistically significant; Jews were 1.8 times more likely than Arabs to give a similar response to both questions. Income level was of borderline significance. Conclusions: At least half of the population was able to differentiate between their personal needs and national policy needs. We do not advocate a decision-making process based on polls or referendums. However, we believe that people should be allowed to express their priorities regarding national policy issues, and that decision-makers should consider these as one of the factors used to determine policy decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条