Confinement of the Crab Nebula with tangled magnetic field by its supernova remnant

被引:8
|
作者
Tanaka, Shuta J. [1 ,2 ]
Toma, Kenji [3 ,4 ]
Tominaga, Nozomu [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Konan Univ, Dept Phys, Fac Sci & Engn, 8-9-1 Okamoto, Kobe, Hyogo 6588501, Japan
[2] Aoyama Gakuin Univ, Dept Math & Phys, 5-10-1 Fuchinobe, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2525258, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ, Frontier Res Inst Interdisciplinary Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9808578, Japan
[4] Tohoku Univ, Astron Inst, Sendai, Miyagi 9808578, Japan
[5] Univ Tokyo, Kavli Inst Phys & Math Universe, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778583, Japan
关键词
magnetic fields; MHD; radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; turbulence; pulsars: individual (Crab pulsar); ISM: individual objects (Crab Nebula); PULSAR WIND NEBULAE; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC SIMULATIONS; PARTICLE-ACCELERATION; GRB OUTFLOWS; SHOCK; DISSIPATION; MODEL; RADIATION; FLUCTUATIONS; RECONNECTION;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/sty1356
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
A pulsar wind is a relativistic outflow dominated by Poynting energy at its base. Based on the standard ideal magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model of pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) with the ordered magnetic field, the observed slow expansion nu(PWN) << c requires the wind to be dominated by kinetic energy at the upstream of its termination shock, which conflicts with the pulsar wind theory (sigma-problem). In this paper, we extend the standard model of PWNe by phenomenologically taking into account conversion of the ordered to turbulent magnetic field and dissipation of the turbulent magnetic field. Disordering of the magnetic structure is inferred from the recent three-dimensional relativistic ideal MHD simulations, while magnetic dissipation is a non-ideal MHD effect requiring a finite resistivity. We apply this model to the Crab Nebula and find that the conversion effect is important for the flow deceleration, while the dissipation effect is not. Even for Poynting-dominated pulsar wind, we obtain the Crab Nebula's nu(PWN) by adopting a finite conversion time-scale of similar to 0.3 yr. Magnetic dissipation primarily affects the synchrotron radiation properties. Any values of the pulsar wind magnetization sigma(w) are allowed within the present model of the PWN dynamics alone, and even a small termination shock radius of << 0.1 pc reproduces the observed dynamical features of the Crab Nebula. In order to establish a high-sigma(w) model of PWNe, it is important to extend the present model by taking into account the broad-band spectrum and its spatial profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:4622 / 4633
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] G21.5-0.9 - SUPERNOVA REMNANT RESEMBLING CRAB-NEBULA
    WILSON, AS
    WEILER, KW
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 1976, 53 (01) : 89 - 92
  • [2] PRODUCTION OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD OF THE CRAB NEBULA
    MARSHALL, L
    NUOVO CIMENTO, 1959, 12 (05): : 477 - 482
  • [3] GAMMA CYGNI SUPERNOVA REMNANT AND NEBULA
    JOHNSON, HM
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1974, 194 (02): : 337 - &
  • [4] THE MAGNETIC-FIELD OF THE CRAB-NEBULA AND THE NATURE OF ITS JET
    BIETENHOLZ, MF
    KRONBERG, PP
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 357 (01): : L13 - &
  • [5] Chandra observation of supernova remnant G54.1+0.3:: A close cousin of the Crab Nebula
    Lu, FJ
    Wang, QD
    Aschenbach, B
    Durouchoux, P
    Song, LM
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 568 (01): : L49 - L52
  • [6] About the magnetic field generation in Crab Nebula
    Nanobashvili, IS
    PULSAR ASTRONOMY - 2000 AND BEYOND: IAU COLLOQUIUM 177, 2000, 202 : 609 - 610
  • [7] Supernova remnant candidates in the 30 Doradus nebula
    Lazendic, JS
    Dickel, JR
    Jones, PA
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 596 (01): : 287 - 298
  • [8] An earlier explosion date for the Crab Nebula supernova
    Helmut A.Abt
    John W.Fountain
    ResearchinAstronomyandAstrophysics, 2018, 18 (04) : 3 - 8
  • [9] Magnetic field in supernova remnant SN 1987A
    Berezhko, E. G.
    Ksenofontov, L. T.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 650 (01): : L59 - L62
  • [10] EVOLUTION OF THE CRAB NEBULA IN A LOW ENERGY SUPERNOVA
    Yang, Haifeng
    Chevalier, Roger A.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 806 (02):