A review of data assimilation of remote sensing and crop models

被引:359
|
作者
Jin, Xiuliang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kumar, Lalit [5 ]
Li, Zhenhai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Feng, Haikuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Xu, Xingang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Guijun [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Jihua [6 ]
机构
[1] Minist Agr, Key Lab Quantitat Remote Sensing Agr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Res Ctr Informat Technol Agr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Engn Res Ctr Informat Technol Agr, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Engn Res Ctr Agr Internet Things, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
[5] Univ New England, Ecosyst Management, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[6] Beijing Res Ctr Agrifood Testing & Farmland Monit, Beijing 100097, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; “十二五”国家科技支撑计划重点项目”;
关键词
Crop models; Remote sensing; Canopy state variables; Data assimilation; Yield; LEAF-AREA INDEX; SEQUENTIAL DATA ASSIMILATION; ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER; RICE YIELD ESTIMATION; POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA; IN-SITU MEASUREMENTS; SOIL-MOISTURE; WHEAT YIELD; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; SENSED INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2017.11.002
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Timely and accurate estimation of crop yield before harvest to allow crop yields management decision-making at a regional scale is crucial for national food policy and security assessments. Modeling dynamic change of crop growth is of great help because it allows researchers to determine crop management strategies for maximizing crop yield. Remote sensing is often used to provide information about important canopy state variables for crop models of large regions. Crop models and remote sensing techniques have been combined and applied in crop yield estimation on a regional scale or worldwide based on the simultaneous development of crop models and remote sensing. Many studies have proposed models for estimating canopy state variables and soil properties based on remote sensing data and assimilating these estimated canopy state variables into crop models. This paper, firstly, summarizes recent developments of crop models, remote sensing technology, and data assimilation methods. Secondly, it compares the advantages and disadvantages of different data assimilation methods (calibration method, forcing method, and updating method) for assimilating remote sensing data into crop models and analyzes the impacts of different error sources on the different parts of the data assimilation chain in detail. Finally, it provides some methods that can be used to reduce the different errors of data assimilation and presents further opportunities and development direction of data assimilation for future studies. This paper presents a detailed overview of the comparative introduction, latest developments and applications of crop models, remote sensing techniques, and data assimilation methods in the growth status monitoring and yield estimation of crops. In particular, it discusses the impacts of different error sources on the different portions of the data assimilation chain in detail and analyzes how to reduce the different errors of data assimilation chain. The literature shows that many new satellite sensors and valuable methods have been developed for the retrieval of canopy state variables and soil properties from remote sensing data for assimilating the retrieved variables into crop models. Additionally, new proposed or modified crop models have been reported for improving the simulated canopy state variables and soil properties of crop models. In short, the data assimilation of remote sensing and crop models have the potential to improve the estimation accuracy of canopy state variables, soil properties and yield based on these new technologies and methods in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 152
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assimilation of remote sensing data in crop growth models
    Guerif, M
    Courault, D
    Brisson, N
    INRA BIOCLIMATOLOGY DEPARTMENT RESEARCH COURSE, VOL 2: FROM PLANT CANOPY TO THE REGION, 1996, : 169 - 191
  • [2] The use of radiative transfer models for remote sensing data assimilation in crop growth models
    Bach, H
    Mauser, W
    Schneider, K
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2003, : 35 - 40
  • [3] Particle Swarm Optimization for Assimilation of Remote Sensing Data in dynamic Crop Models
    Wagner, Matthias P.
    Taravat, Alireza
    Oppelt, Natascha
    REMOTE SENSING FOR AGRICULTURE, ECOSYSTEMS, AND HYDROLOGY XXI, 2019, 11149
  • [4] Crop yield estimation based on assimilation of crop models and remote sensing data: A systematic evaluation
    Luo, Li
    Sun, Shikun
    Xue, Jing
    Gao, Zihan
    Zhao, Jinfeng
    Yin, Yali
    Gao, Fei
    Luan, Xiaobo
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 210
  • [5] A review of data assimilation of crop growth simulation based on remote sensing information
    Jiang Zhiwei
    Chen Zhongxin
    Liu Jia
    Sun Liang
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS (AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS 2014), 2014, : 163 - 168
  • [6] Remote Sensing Data Assimilation in Dynamic Crop Models Using Particle Swarm Optimization
    Wagner, Matthias P.
    Slawig, Thomas
    Taravat, Alireza
    Oppelt, Natascha
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (02)
  • [7] Remote Sensing Data Assimilation in Environmental Models
    Vodacek, A.
    Li, Y.
    Garrett, A. J.
    2008 37TH IEEE APPLIED IMAGERY PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOP, 2008, : 225 - +
  • [8] Contribution of Remote Sensing on Crop Models: A Review
    Kasampalis, Dimitrios A.
    Alexandridis, Thomas K.
    Deva, Chetan
    Challinor, Andrew
    Moshou, Dimitrios
    Zalidis, Georgios
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2018, 4 (04)
  • [9] Assimilation of remote sensing into crop growth models: Current status and perspectives
    Huang, Jianxi
    Gomez-Dans, Jose L.
    Huang, Hai
    Ma, Hongyuan
    Wu, Qingling
    Lewis, Philip E.
    Liang, Shunlin
    Chen, Zhongxin
    Xue, Jing-Hao
    Wu, Yantong
    Zhao, Feng
    Wang, Jing
    Xie, Xianhong
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2019, 276
  • [10] Monitoring crop growth based on assimilation of remote sensing data and crop simulation model
    Liu F.
    Li C.
    Dong Y.
    Wang Q.
    Wang J.
    Huang W.
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27 (10): : 101 - 106