Medical Device Regulation: A Comparison of the United States and the European Union

被引:31
|
作者
Maak, Travis G. [1 ]
Wylie, James D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
CARTILAGE REPAIR; INTERVENTION; PATHWAYS; APPROVAL; SAFE;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00403
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Medical device regulation is a controversial topic in both the United States and the European Union. Many physicians and innovators in the United States cite a restrictive US FDA regulatory process as the reason for earlier and more rapid clinical advances in Europe. The FDA approval process mandates that a device be proved efficacious compared with a control or be substantially equivalent to a predicate device, whereas the European Union approval process mandates that the device perform its intended function. Stringent, peer-reviewed safety data have not been reported. However, after recent high-profile device failures, political pressure in both the United States and the European Union has favored more restrictive approval processes. Substantial reforms of the European Union process within the next 5 to 10 years will result in a more stringent approach to device regulation, similar to that of the FDA. Changes in the FDA regulatory process have been suggested but are not imminent.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 544
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条