Comparison of three different injection methods for arterial phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging of the liver

被引:34
|
作者
Tamada, Tsutomu [1 ]
Ito, Katsuyoshi [1 ]
Yoshida, Koji [1 ]
Kanki, Akihiko [1 ]
Higaki, Atsushi [1 ]
Tanimoto, Daigo [1 ]
Higashi, Hiroki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kawasaki Med Sch, Dept Radiol, Kurashiki, Okayama 7010192, Japan
关键词
Gd-EOB-DTPA; Liver; Magnetic resonance (MR); Contrast enhancement; Contrast media; Comparative studies; GADOXETIC-ACID; LESIONS; ARTIFACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.082
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare three different injection methods for optimizing hepatic arterial phase of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MR imaging. Methods: Arterial phase images were obtained after the injection of contrast agent at a rate of 3 mL/s with diluted Gd-EOB-DTPA (dilution method) in 27 patients, 3 mL/s with undiluted Gd-EOB-DTPA (3 mL method) in 26 patients and 1 mL/s with undiluted Gd-EOB-DTPA (1 mL method) in 28 patients. In the quantitative evaluation, signal-to-phantom ratios (SPR) of the liver parenchyma, pancreas, renal cortex, portal vein and aorta were evaluated. In the qualitative evaluation, the seven items for image quality of hepatic arterial phase were assessed, and the total score of all items in each subject was calculated. Results: The score of enhancement of abdominal aorta and total score of seven items in 1 mL method were significantly higher than those in 3 mL method. The SPR of the liver parenchyma in 3 mL method was significantly higher than that in 1 mL method, suggesting substantial hepatic inflow from portal venous return. Conclusion: For the optimal arterial phase imaging, injection rate of 1 mL/s with undiluted Gd-EOB-DTPA is convenient and preferable, compared with other two methods, based on our qualitative analysis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E284 / E288
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Liver tumors: Comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA
    Vogl, TJ
    Kummel, S
    Hammerstingl, R
    Schellenbeck, M
    Schumacher, G
    Balzer, T
    Schwarz, W
    Muller, PK
    Bechstein, WO
    Mack, MG
    Sollner, O
    Felix, R
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [2] Dynamic MR imaging of liver metastases with Gd-EOB-DTPA
    Stern, W
    Schick, F
    Kopp, AF
    Reimer, P
    Shamsi, K
    Claussen, CD
    Laniado, M
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2000, 41 (03) : 255 - 262
  • [3] MR Imaging of Carcinosarcoma of the Liver using Gd-EOB-DTPA
    Yasutake, Tsuyoshi
    Kiryu, Shigeru
    Akai, Hiroyuki
    Watadani, Takeyuki
    Akahane, Masaaki
    Tomizawa, Nobuo
    Gonoi, Wataru
    Ikemura, Masako
    Takahashi, Masamichi
    Matsuoka, Yujiro
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 13 (02) : 117 - 121
  • [4] COMPARISON OF GD-EOB-DTPA AND GD-DTPA FOR CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING OF LIVER-TUMORS
    CLEMENT, O
    MUHLER, A
    VEXLER, VS
    KUWATSURU, R
    BERTHEZENE, Y
    ROSENAU, W
    BRASCH, RC
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (01): : 71 - 77
  • [5] Evaluation of Liver Function using Gadoxetate Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) Enhanced MR Imaging
    Yamada, Akira
    Hara, Takeshi
    Li, Feng
    Doi, Kunio
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS IN MOLECULAR, STRUCTURAL, AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2010, 7626
  • [6] MR liver imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA: The need for different delay times of the hepatobiliary phase in patients with different liver function
    Liang, Minglong
    Zhao, Jun
    Xie, Bing
    Li, Chuanming
    Yin, Xuntao
    Cheng, Lin
    Wang, Jian
    Zhang, Lin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (03) : 546 - 552
  • [7] Comparison Between Areas With Gd-EOB-DTPA Uptake and Without in Hepatocellular Carcinomas on Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced Hepatobiliary-Phase MR Imaging: Pathological Correlation
    Lee, Sanghee
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Park, Cheol Keun
    Kim, Young-sun
    Lee, Won Jae
    Lim, Hyo K.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 32 (03) : 719 - 725
  • [8] Vascular and hepatic enhancements at MR imaging: comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA in the same subjects
    Lin, Yen-Heng
    Hwang, Ruey-Ming
    Chen, Bang-Bin
    Hsu, Chao-Yu
    Yu, Chih-Wei
    Kao, Jia-Horng
    Lee, Hsuan-Shu
    Liang, Po-Chin
    Wei, Shwu-Yuan
    Shih, Tiffany Ting-Fang
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2014, 38 (03) : 287 - 291
  • [9] Biliary MR Imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Its Clinical Applications
    Lee, Nam Kyung
    Kim, Suk
    Lee, Jun Woo
    Lee, Suk Hong
    Kang, Dae Hwan
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Seo, Hyung Il
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2009, 29 (06) : 1707 - +
  • [10] Comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging and Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging in the detection of focal liver tumors in the same patient
    Vogl, TJ
    Kuemmel, S
    Hammerstingl, R
    Schwarz, W
    Schellenbeck, M
    Mueller, PK
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 1035 - 1035