Agency Lawyers' Answers to the Major Questions Doctrine

被引:0
|
作者
Hornung, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Law Sch, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
来源
YALE JOURNAL ON REGULATION | 2020年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
CHEVRON; DEFERENCE; CANONS; POWER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This Note addresses two questions: how does the major questions doctrine affect the way agency lawyers advise policymaking clients, and how does that advice affect agency statutory interpretation and regulation? I first describe the doctrine and discuss normative theories for the role agency lawyers should play in statutory interpretation. Second, I consider the effects the doctrine had during the rulemaking, litigation, and rescission of the Clean Power Plan (CPP), the first ever federal regulation of power plants' greenhouse-gas emissions. Finally, I identify four major concerns with the doctrine's ex ante effects on agency statutory interpretation and regulatory processes. These critiques apply broadly, beyond the CPP.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 799
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条