It's Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation: Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science

被引:145
|
作者
Tackett, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Lilienfeld, Scott O. [2 ]
Patrick, Christopher J. [3 ]
Johnson, Sheri L. [4 ]
Krueger, Robert F. [5 ]
Miller, Joshua D. [6 ]
Oltmanns, Thomas F. [7 ]
Shrout, Patrick E. [8 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[6] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[7] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
[8] NYU, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
assessment; diagnosis; disorders; scientific methodology; REPLICATION CRISIS; STATISTICAL POWER; SAMPLE-SIZE; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; RELIABILITY; FAILURE; RDOC;
D O I
10.1177/1745691617690042
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Psychology is in the early stages of examining a crisis of replicability stemming from several high-profile failures to replicate studies in experimental psychology. This important conversation has largely been focused on social psychology, with some active participation from cognitive psychology. Nevertheless, several other major domains of psychological scienceincluding clinical sciencehave remained insulated from this discussion. The goals of this article are to (a) examine why clinical psychology and allied fields, such as counseling and school psychology, have not been central participants in the replicability conversation; (b) review concerns and recommendations that are less (or more) applicable to or appropriate for research in clinical psychology and allied fields; and (c) generate take-home messages for scholars and consumers of the literature in clinical psychology and allied fields, as well as reviewers, editors, and colleagues from other areas of psychological science.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 756
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条