Aggregative egg distributions may promote species co-existence - but why do they exist?

被引:0
|
作者
Hoffmeister, TS [1 ]
Rohlfs, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Inst Zool, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
关键词
Allee effect; Drosophila subobscura; egg distribution; fitness; individual behaviour; parasitoids; refuge;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Although the effects of aggregated egg distributions for the co-existence of Drosophila species are fairly well understood, the driving forces that select for such egg distributions remain unclear. This study investigated the fitness consequences of Drosophila oviposition behaviour on natural breeding substrates under controlled conditions. We used fruits of Sorbus aucuparia as an oviposition substrate and recorded the clutch sizes that Drosophila subobscura females produce and the way in which individuals distribute their eggs across fruits. We found that D. subobscura females significantly aggregated their eggs. We tested the two most obvious hypotheses that might explain the distribution pattern of the eggs. Neither the hypothesis that larvae benefit from resource-dependent facilitation when feeding in groups, nor the hypothesis that Sorbus fruits might provide a negatively density-dependent refuge against parasitoid attack, is supported by our data. In contrast, our results suggest that flies should distribute their eggs regularly across fruits if the maximization of offspring survival is the selecting force. We discuss under which circumstances the observed distribution pattern might be adaptive.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 50
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Specificity and localised distribution of mycorrhizal fungi in the soil may contribute to co-existence of orchid species
    Waud, Michael
    Busschaert, Pieter
    Lievens, Bart
    Jacquemyn, Hans
    FUNGAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 20 : 155 - 165
  • [2] Similarity and local co-existence of species in regional biotas
    MATHEW A. Leibold
    Evolutionary Ecology, 1998, 12 : 95 - 110
  • [3] The hydrological niche and spatially structured species co-existence
    Harpole, William Stanley
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (02) : 215 - 216
  • [4] Pairwise co-existence of Bismarck and Solomon landbird species
    Sanderson, James G.
    Diamond, Jared M.
    Pimm, Stuart L.
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (05) : 771 - 786
  • [5] Similarity and local co-existence of species in regional biotas
    Leibold, MA
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (01) : 95 - 110
  • [6] Species co-existence and character divergence across carnivores
    Davies, T. Jonathan
    Meiri, Shai
    Barraclough, Timothy G.
    Gittleman, John L.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 10 (02) : 146 - 152
  • [7] Local extinctions promote co-existence of semelparous and iteroparous life histories
    Ranta, E
    Tesar, D
    Kaitala, V
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2001, 3 (07) : 759 - 766
  • [8] Why do species exist? Insights from sexuals and asexuals
    Barraclough, TG
    Herniou, E
    ZOOLOGY, 2003, 106 (04) : 275 - 282
  • [9] Soil biota and chemical interactions promote co-existence in co-evolved grassland communities
    Semchenko, Marina
    Nettan, Slim
    Sepp, Anette
    Zhang, Qiaoying
    Abakumova, Maria
    Davison, John
    Kalamees, Rein
    Lepik, Anu
    Pussa, Kersti
    Saar, Sirgi
    Saarma, Merilin
    Thetloff, Marge
    Zobel, Kristjan
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2019, 107 (06) : 2611 - 2622
  • [10] Do communities exist? Complex patterns of overlapping marine species distributions
    Leaper, Rebecca
    Dunstan, Piers K.
    Foster, Scott D.
    Barrett, Neville S.
    Edgar, Graham J.
    ECOLOGY, 2014, 95 (07) : 2016 - 2025