AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF SELECTED SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS UNDER GREENHOUSE AND FIELD INFESTED WITH MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA AND SOILBORNE INSECT PESTS

被引:0
|
作者
de Oliveira Lima, Fabia Silva [1 ]
dos Santos, Gil Rodrigues [2 ]
Correa, Valdir Ribeiro [1 ]
Rocha dos Santos, Patricia Resplandes [2 ]
Ribeiro Correia, Marcus Andre [3 ]
Nogueira, Sonia Regina [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Tocantins, Campus Dianopolis, BR-77300000 Dianopolis, TO, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Tocantins, Dept Fitopatol, Campus Gurupi, BR-77402970 Gurupi, TO, Brazil
[3] Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Tocantins, Campus Araguatins, BR-77950000 Araguatins, TO, Brazil
[4] Embrapa Acre, Rodovia BR-364 Km 14, BR-69900056 Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil
关键词
biofuel; Ipomoea batatas; resistance; root knot nematodes; yield; KNOT NEMATODE RESISTANCE; RACES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The root knot nematode (RKN), Meloidogyne incognita, is widespread worldwide and a major pathogen of several cultivated crops. The use of resistant genotypes is the most effective and environmentally sound way to manage RKN. In this study, we screened 16 selected sweet potato cultivars including Amanda, Barbara, Beatriz, Beauregard, Brazlandia Branca, Brazlandia Rosada, Brazlandia Roxa, BRS Amelia, BRS Cuia, BRS Rubissol, Carolina Vitoria, Duda, Julia, Marcela, PA-26/2009, and Princesa obtained from Embrapa and Universidade Federal do Tocantins' germplasm bank. Studies were conducted under greenhouse and field conditions and the agronomic performance of the cultivars was evaluated in a nematode and soilborne insect-infested field. All 16 sweet potato cultivars tested were rated as resistant to this nematode both under greenhouse and field conditions with reproduction factors < 1. In the field infested with M. incognita, sweet potato cultivars Duda, BRS Amelia, Beauregard, Brazlandia Rosada, and Brazlandia Roxa stood out as superior cultivars, with average yield ranging from 26 to 47 tons per ha. Overall, most cultivars exhibited a fusiform to near fusiform root shape, a good characteristic for the market, and were moderately affected by insects (attack incidence 1 to 30%). As global demand for energy continues to rise, selecting new cultivars of sweet potatoes with increased resistance to nematode diseases and with high yield will be important for food security and biofuel production.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 105
页数:9
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Reaction of selected potato cultivars to Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum under greenhouse conditions
    Getu, Tasew
    Mohammed, Wassu
    Seid, Awol
    Mekete, Tesfamariam
    Kassa, Bekele
    ARCHIVES OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY AND PLANT PROTECTION, 2021, 54 (17-18) : 1456 - 1470
  • [2] RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF 2 CASSAVA CULTIVARS IN A FIELD INFESTED WITH MELOIDOGYNE-INCOGNITA
    MCSORLEY, R
    PARRADO, JL
    SOIL AND CROP SCIENCE SOCIETY OF FLORIDA PROCEEDINGS, 1985, 44 : 180 - 183
  • [3] PERFORMANCE OF SOYBEAN CULTIVARS IN A FIELD INFESTED WITH MELOIDOGYNE-INCOGNITA AND HETERODERA-GLYCINES
    WEAVER, DB
    RODRIGUEZKABANA, R
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1985, 75 (10) : 1180 - 1180
  • [4] Evaluation of the Reaction of Various Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars to the Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum Disease Complex under Field Conditions
    Tasew Getu
    Wassu Mohammed
    Awol Seid
    Tesfamariam Mekete
    Bekele Kassa
    Potato Research, 2024, 67 : 73 - 91
  • [5] Evaluation of the Reaction of Various Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars to the Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum Disease Complex under Field Conditions
    Getu, Tasew
    Mohammed, Wassu
    Seid, Awol
    Mekete, Tesfamariam
    Kassa, Bekele
    POTATO RESEARCH, 2024, 67 (01) : 73 - 91
  • [6] Host-status and host-sensitivity of potato cultivars 'BP1' and 'Buffelspoort' to Meloidogyne java']javanica and Meloidogyne incognita race 2 under greenhouse and micro plot conditions
    Mulandana, N. K.
    Pofu, K. M.
    Slabbert, M. M.
    XXX INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS IHC2018: II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INNOVATIVE PLANT PROTECTION IN HORTICULTURE, 2020, 1269 : 119 - 128