Referrals from community optometrists in England and their replies: A mixed methods study

被引:7
|
作者
Harvey, Krystynne [1 ,2 ]
Edgar, David F. [3 ]
Agarwal, Rishi [1 ,2 ]
Benwell, Martin J. [4 ]
Evans, Bruce J. W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] London South Bank Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, London, England
[2] Inst Optometry, London, England
[3] City Univ London, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Optometry & Visual Sci, London, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Coll Med & Hlth, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
community optometry; interprofessional communication; mixed methods; referral reply rate; referrals; GLAUCOMA REFERRALS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1111/opo.12948
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose Community optometrists, through routine eye examinations, identify patients with disease or ocular abnormalities requiring referral to the Hospital Eye Service. In many cases no reply to the referral letter is received, resulting in some patients being re-referred unnecessarily, potentially increasing the number of other patients who lose sight whilst on hospital waiting lists. This study investigated, qualitatively and quantitatively, factors influencing optometric referrals and replies. Methods The three-phase, sequential mixed methods study started with a literature review and qualitative phase, interviewing stakeholders to identify issues for exploration in subsequent phases. The second, quantitative phase, undertook documentary analysis of 349 patient referral records from three optometric practice modalities (domiciliary, independently owned, and corporate chain) in England. A final qualitative phase obtained views from stakeholders to explore unexplained findings from the first two phases. Results Phase 1 identified communication, financial, professional and technological issues for further exploration. In Phase 2, the referral rate was 22.2% for domiciliary provider, 2.1% for independent practice and 2.5% for the corporate chain, with the variation most likely explained by patient age and associated ophthalmic disease, illness and disability. The referral reply rate was 5.7% for domiciliary provider, 25.0% for independent practice and 4.9% for the corporate chain. The community optometrist remained unaware of the outcome of their referral in 72.8% of cases. Qualitative analyses indicate the main factors influencing referral reply rates are technology, the General Medical Practitioner, community optometrists' utility to and utility of the National Health Service and patient mobilisation. Conclusions The low referral reply rate creates a break in the feedback loop required to raise the standard of referrals and avoid unnecessary re-referral. Of the factors identified that influence referral reply rates, technology is key in view of the increasing use of online referral platforms. Feedback to the referring optometrist should be embedded in such systems.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 470
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Referrals from community optometrists to the hospital eye service in England
    Evans, Bruce J. W.
    Edgar, David F.
    Jessa, Zahra
    Yammouni, Robert
    Campbell, Peter
    Soteri, Kiki
    Hobby, Angharad
    Khatoon, Abeeda
    Beg, Amaad
    Harsum, Steven
    Aggarwal, Rajesh
    Shah, Rakhee
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2021, 41 (02) : 365 - 377
  • [2] Referrals from community optometrists to the hospital eye service in Scotland and England
    Shah, Rakhee
    Edgar, David F.
    Khatoon, Abeeda
    Hobby, Angharad
    Jessa, Zahra
    Yammouni, Robert
    Campbell, Peter
    Soteri, Kiki
    Beg, Amaad
    Harsum, Steven
    Aggarwal, Rajesh
    Evans, Bruce J. W.
    EYE, 2022, 36 (09) : 1754 - 1760
  • [3] Referrals from community optometrists to the hospital eye service in Scotland and England
    Rakhee Shah
    David F. Edgar
    Abeeda Khatoon
    Angharad Hobby
    Zahra Jessa
    Robert Yammouni
    Peter Campbell
    Kiki Soteri
    Amaad Beg
    Steven Harsum
    Rajesh Aggarwal
    Bruce J. W. Evans
    Eye, 2022, 36 : 1754 - 1760
  • [4] The Potential of Optometrists' Referrals of Older Patients to Community-Based Exercise Programs: Findings From a Mixed-Methods Study
    Miyawaki, Christina E.
    Mauldin, Rebecca L.
    Carman, Carolyn R.
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2020, 28 (02) : 194 - 207
  • [5] Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service
    Bowling, B
    Chen, SDM
    Salmon, JF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (09) : 1102 - 1104
  • [6] METHODS QUESTIONED IN NEW ENGLAND STUDY - REPLIES
    BRAKKE, NB
    JOURNAL OF COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 1982, 54 (688): : 101 - 101
  • [7] Does Goldmann applanation tonometry performed by community optometrists reduce referrals? A pilot study
    Sheehan, William
    Adams, David
    Wells, Colette
    Booth, Adam
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 95 (02) : 295 - 295
  • [8] REFERRALS FROM OPTOMETRISTS TO OPHTHALMOLOGISTS IN A PREPAID HEALTH CENTER
    GRIFFIN, JR
    LUCKERMAN, RS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPTOMETRY, 1971, 48 (07): : 615 - +
  • [10] The impact of SIGN glaucoma guidelines on false-positive referrals from community optometrists in Central Scotland
    Sii, Samantha
    Nasser, Ahmad
    Loo, Cheng Yi
    Croghan, Catherine
    Rotchford, Alan
    Agarwal, Pankaj Kumar
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 103 (03) : 369 - 373